Sign upLogin

activerecord-hackery/ransack

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 56 of 56 total issues

Method attribute has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def attribute(key, options = {})
        unless context = options.delete(:context)
          raise ArgumentError, "A context is required to translate attributes"
        end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/translate.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method walk_tree has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def walk_tree(associations, hash)
        case associations
        when TreeNode
          associations.add_to_tree(hash)
        when Hash
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/polyamorous/activerecord/join_dependency.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      ['present'.freeze, {
        arel_predicate: proc { |v| v ? NOT_EQ_ALL : EQ_ANY },
        compounds: false,
        type: :boolean,
        validator: proc { |v| BOOLEAN_VALUES.include?(v) },
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/constants.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/ransack/constants.rb on lines 136..142

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      ['blank'.freeze, {
        arel_predicate: proc { |v| v ? EQ_ANY : NOT_EQ_ALL },
        compounds: false,
        type: :boolean,
        validator: proc { |v| BOOLEAN_VALUES.include?(v) },
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/constants.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/ransack/constants.rb on lines 128..134

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method method_missing has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def method_missing(method_id, *args)
      method_name = method_id.to_s
      getter_name = method_name.sub(/=$/, ''.freeze)
      if base.attribute_method?(getter_name)
        base.send(method_id, *args)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/search.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_attribute has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def build_attribute(name = nil, ransacker_args = [])
        Attribute.new(@context, name, ransacker_args).tap do |attribute|
          @context.bind(attribute, attribute.name)
          self.attributes << attribute if name.nil? || attribute.valid?
          if predicate && !negative?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/nodes/condition.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method join_constraints has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def join_constraints(joins_to_add, alias_tracker, references)
      @alias_tracker = alias_tracker
      @joined_tables = {}
      @references = {}
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/polyamorous/activerecord/join_dependency.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method attr_value_for_attribute has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def attr_value_for_attribute(attr)
        return attr.attr if ActiveRecord::Base.connection.adapter_name == "PostgreSQL"

        predicate.case_insensitive ? attr.attr.lower : attr.attr
      rescue
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/nodes/condition.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method sort_link has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def sort_link(search_object, attribute, *args, &block)
        search, routing_proxy = extract_search_and_routing_proxy(search_object)
        unless Search === search
          raise TypeError, 'First argument must be a Ransack::Search!'
        end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/helpers/form_helper.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def build(params)
      collapse_multiparameter_attributes!(params).each do |key, value|
        if ['s'.freeze, 'sorts'.freeze].freeze.include?(key)
          send("#{key}=", value)
        elsif @context.ransackable_scope?(key, @context.object)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/search.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      ['true'.freeze, {
        arel_predicate: proc { |v| v ? EQ : NOT_EQ },
        compounds: false,
        type: :boolean,
        validator: proc { |v| BOOLEAN_VALUES.include?(v) },
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/constants.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/ransack/constants.rb on lines 104..110

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      ['not_true'.freeze, {
        arel_predicate: proc { |v| v ? NOT_EQ : EQ },
        compounds: false,
        type: :boolean,
        validator: proc { |v| BOOLEAN_VALUES.include?(v) },
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/constants.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/ransack/constants.rb on lines 96..102

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      ['false'.freeze, {
        arel_predicate: proc { |v| v ? EQ : NOT_EQ },
        compounds: false,
        type: :boolean,
        validator: proc { |v| BOOLEAN_VALUES.include?(v) },
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/constants.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/ransack/constants.rb on lines 120..126

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      ['not_false'.freeze, {
        arel_predicate: proc { |v| v ? NOT_EQ : EQ },
        compounds: false,
        type: :boolean,
        validator: proc { |v| BOOLEAN_VALUES.include?(v) },
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/constants.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/ransack/constants.rb on lines 112..118

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      ['null'.freeze, {
        arel_predicate: proc { |v| v ? EQ : NOT_EQ },
        compounds: false,
        type: :boolean,
        validator: proc { |v| BOOLEAN_VALUES.include?(v) },
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/constants.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/ransack/constants.rb on lines 152..157

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      ['not_null'.freeze, {
        arel_predicate: proc { |v| v ? NOT_EQ : EQ },
        compounds: false,
        type: :boolean,
        validator: proc { |v| BOOLEAN_VALUES.include?(v) },
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ransack/constants.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/ransack/constants.rb on lines 144..150

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language