Method evaluate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def evaluate(search, opts = {})
viz = Visitor.new
relation = @object.where(viz.accept(search.base))
if search.sorts.any?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File context.rb
has 264 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'ransack/context'
require 'polyamorous/polyamorous'
module Ransack
module Adapters
Class Context
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Context < ::Ransack::Context
def relation_for(object)
object.all
end
Method extract_correlated_key
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_correlated_key(join_root)
case join_root
when Arel::Nodes::OuterJoin
# one of join_root.right/join_root.left is expected to be Arel::Nodes::On
if join_root.right.is_a?(Arel::Nodes::On)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_joins
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_joins(relation)
buckets = relation.joins_values + relation.left_outer_joins_values
buckets = buckets.group_by do |join|
case join
Method attribute_method?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def attribute_method?(str, klass = @klass)
exists = false
if ransackable_attribute?(str, klass)
exists = true
elsif (segments = str.split(Constants::UNDERSCORE)).size > 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_parent_and_attribute_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_parent_and_attribute_name(str, parent = @base)
attr_name = nil
if ransackable_attribute?(str, klassify(parent))
attr_name = str
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method type_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def type_for(attr)
return nil unless attr && attr.valid?
relation = attr.arel_attribute.relation
name = attr.arel_attribute.name.to_s
table = relation.respond_to?(:table_name) ? relation.table_name : relation.name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"