Showing 33 of 33 total issues
Function exports
has 206 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (grunt) {
grunt.initConfig({
pkg: grunt.file.readJSON('package.json'),
clean: {
Function _format
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
MessageFormat.prototype._format = function (pattern, values, builderCtx, builderFactory) {
var builder = builderFactory(builderCtx);
var i, len, part, id, value;
for (i = 0, len = pattern.length; i < len; i += 1) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compileArgument
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Compiler.prototype.compileArgument = function (element) {
if (existsIn(this.tagNames, element.id)) {
throw new Error('Message has conflicting argument and tag name "' + element.id + '".');
}
Function MessageFormat
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function MessageFormat(message, locales, formats, opts) {
// Parse string messages into an AST.
var ast = typeof message === 'string' ?
MessageFormat.__parse(message) : message;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function pluralRuleFunction
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default {"locale":"en","pluralRuleFunction":function (n,ord){var s=String(n).split("."),v0=!s[1],t0=Number(s[0])==n,n10=t0&&s[0].slice(-1),n100=t0&&s[0].slice(-2);if(ord)return n10==1&&n100!=11?"one":n10==2&&n100!=12?"two":n10==3&&n100!=13?"few":"other";return n==1&&v0?"one":"other"}};
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _format
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
MessageFormat.prototype._format = function (pattern, values, builderCtx, builderFactory) {
var builder = builderFactory(builderCtx);
var i, len, part, id, value;
for (i = 0, len = pattern.length; i < len; i += 1) {
Function MessageFormat
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function MessageFormat(message, locales, formats, opts) {
// Parse string messages into an AST.
var ast = typeof message === 'string' ?
MessageFormat.__parse(message) : message;
Function append
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ArrayBuilder.prototype.append = function (element) {
if (typeof element === 'undefined' || element === null) {
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compileMessage
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Compiler.prototype.compileMessage = function (ast) {
if (!(ast && ast.type === 'messageFormatPattern')) {
throw new Error('Message AST is not of type: "messageFormatPattern"');
}
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 'dateFormat':
options = formats.date[format.style];
return {
id : element.id,
format: new Intl.DateTimeFormat(locales, options).format
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 'timeFormat':
options = formats.time[format.style];
return {
id : element.id,
format: new Intl.DateTimeFormat(locales, options).format
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 'numberFormat':
options = formats.number[format.style];
return {
id : element.id,
format: new Intl.NumberFormat(locales, options).format
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function extend
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function extend(obj) {
var sources = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1),
i, len, source, key;
for (i = 0, len = sources.length; i < len; i += 1) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _resolveLocale
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
MessageFormat.prototype._resolveLocale = function (locales) {
if (typeof locales === 'string') {
locales = [locales];
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PluralFormat
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PluralFormat(id, useOrdinal, offset, options, pluralFn) {
Function _compilePattern
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
MessageFormat.prototype._compilePattern = function (ast, locales, formats, pluralFn, opts) {
minimatch
Regular Expression Denial of Service Open
"minimatch": {
"version": "0.3.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/minimatch/-/minimatch-0.3.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha1-J12O2qxPG7MyZHIInnlJyDlGmd0=",
"dev": true,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Regular Expression Denial of Service
Overview:
Minimatch is a minimal matching utility that works by converting glob expressions into JavaScript RegExp
objects. The primary function, minimatch(path, pattern)
is vulnerable to ReDoS in the pattern
parameter. This is because of the regular expression on line 521 of minimatch.js: /((?:\\{2})*)(\\?)\|/g,
. The problematic portion of the regex is ((?:\\{2})*)
which matches against \\
.
A proof of concept is as follows: ``` var minimatch = require(“minimatch”);
// utility function for generating long strings var genstr = function (len, chr) { var result = “”; for (i=0; i<=len; i++) { result = result + chr; } return result; }
var exploit = “[!” + genstr(1000000, “\”) + “A”;
// minimatch exploit. console.log(“starting minimatch”); minimatch(“foo”, exploit); console.log(“finishing minimatch”); ```
Recommendation:
Updated to version 3.0.2 or greater
minimatch
Regular Expression Denial of Service Open
"minimatch": {
"version": "2.0.10",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/minimatch/-/minimatch-2.0.10.tgz",
"integrity": "sha1-jQh8OcazjAAbl/ynzm0OHoCvusc=",
"dev": true,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Regular Expression Denial of Service
Overview:
Minimatch is a minimal matching utility that works by converting glob expressions into JavaScript RegExp
objects. The primary function, minimatch(path, pattern)
is vulnerable to ReDoS in the pattern
parameter. This is because of the regular expression on line 521 of minimatch.js: /((?:\\{2})*)(\\?)\|/g,
. The problematic portion of the regex is ((?:\\{2})*)
which matches against \\
.
A proof of concept is as follows: ``` var minimatch = require(“minimatch”);
// utility function for generating long strings var genstr = function (len, chr) { var result = “”; for (i=0; i<=len; i++) { result = result + chr; } return result; }
var exploit = “[!” + genstr(1000000, “\”) + “A”;
// minimatch exploit. console.log(“starting minimatch”); minimatch(“foo”, exploit); console.log(“finishing minimatch”); ```
Recommendation:
Updated to version 3.0.2 or greater
debug
Regular Expression Denial of Service Open
"debug": {
"version": "2.2.0",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/debug/-/debug-2.2.0.tgz",
"integrity": "sha1-+HBX6ZWxofauaklgZkE3vFbwOdo=",
"dev": true,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Regular Expression Denial of Service
Overview:
The debug module is vulnerable to regular expression denial of service when untrusted user input is passed into the o
formatter. It takes around 50k characters to block for 2 seconds making this a low severity issue.
Recommendation:
Upgrade to version 2.6.9 or greater if you are on the 2.6.x series or 3.1.0 or greater.
growl
Command Injection Open
"growl": {
"version": "1.9.2",
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/growl/-/growl-1.9.2.tgz",
"integrity": "sha1-Dqd0NxXbjY3ixe3hd14bRayFwC8=",
"dev": true
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Command Injection
Overview:
Growl adds growl notification support to nodejs.
Growl does not properly sanitize input before passing it to exec, allowing for arbitrary command execution.
Recommendation:
Update to version 1.10.2 or greater