Showing 3,294 of 3,294 total issues
Function loadAgents
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function loadAgents() {
// If we're already loading agents return same promise
if (_loadAgentsPromise) {
return _loadAgentsPromise;
}
Function formatHints
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function formatHints(hints, query) {
return hints.map(function (token) {
var $hintObj = $("<span>").addClass("brackets-js-hints");
// level indicates either variable scope or property confidence
Function insertHtmlHint
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
UrlCodeHints.prototype.insertHtmlHint = function (completion) {
var cursor = this.editor.getCursorPos(),
start = {line: -1, ch: -1},
end = {line: -1, ch: -1},
tagInfo = HTMLUtils.getTagInfo(this.editor, cursor),
Function _generatePosition
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_generatePosition: function(event) {
var o = this.options, scroll = this.cssPosition == 'absolute' && !(this.scrollParent[0] != document && $.contains(this.scrollParent[0], this.offsetParent[0])) ? this.offsetParent : this.scrollParent, scrollIsRootNode = (/(html|body)/i).test(scroll[0].tagName);
var pageX = event.pageX;
var pageY = event.pageY;
Function effect
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
effect: function( effect, options, speed, callback ) {
var args = _normalizeArguments.apply( this, arguments ),
mode = args.mode,
queue = args.queue,
effectMethod = $.effects.effect[ args.effect ],
Function load
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
load: function( url, params, callback ) {
if ( typeof url !== "string" && _load ) {
return _load.apply( this, arguments );
// Don't do a request if no elements are being requested
Function handleSwitchLanguage
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function handleSwitchLanguage() {
var stringsPath = FileUtils.getNativeBracketsDirectoryPath() + "/nls";
FileSystem.getDirectoryForPath(stringsPath).getContents(function (err, entries) {
if (!err) {
Function loadExtensionModule
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function loadExtensionModule(name, config, entryPoint) {
var extensionConfig = {
context: name,
baseUrl: config.baseUrl,
paths: globalPaths,
Function drop
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function drop() {
preDropCleanup();
if (sourceView.paneId === currentView.paneId && startingIndex === $el.index()) {
// if the item was dragged but not moved then don't open or close
if (!dragged) {
Function findExternalChanges
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function findExternalChanges(docs) {
toReload = [];
toClose = [];
editConflicts = [];
Function _getTagAttributeValue
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _getTagAttributeValue(editor, pos) {
var ctx, tagName, attrName, exclusionList = [], offset, textBefore, textAfter;
ctx = TokenUtils.getInitialContext(editor._codeMirror, pos);
offset = TokenUtils.offsetInToken(ctx);
Function update
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
HashCollisionNode.prototype.update = function(ownerID, shift, keyHash, key, value, didChangeSize, didAlter) {
if (keyHash === undefined) {
keyHash = hash(key);
}
Function getParameterHints
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ParameterHintsProvider.prototype.getParameterHints = function () {
if (!this.client) {
return null;
}
Function CSSPreprocessorDocumentModule
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
define(function CSSPreprocessorDocumentModule(require, exports, module) {
"use strict";
var _ = require("thirdparty/lodash"),
EventDispatcher = require("utils/EventDispatcher"),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _createServer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _createServer(path, port, createCompleteCallback) {
var server,
app,
address,
pathKey = getPathKey(path);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function _swapWorkingSetListIndexes(paneId, index1, index2) {
var pane = _getPane(paneId);
pane.swapViewListIndexes(index1, index2);
exports.trigger("workingSetSort", pane.id);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (event.shiftKey &&
(event.keyCode === KeyEvent.DOM_VK_UP ||
event.keyCode === KeyEvent.DOM_VK_DOWN ||
event.keyCode === KeyEvent.DOM_VK_PAGE_UP ||
event.keyCode === KeyEvent.DOM_VK_PAGE_DOWN)) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 33: $.datepicker._adjustDate(event.target, (event.ctrlKey ?
-$.datepicker._get(inst, 'stepBigMonths') :
-$.datepicker._get(inst, 'stepMonths')), 'M');
break; // previous month/year on page up/+ ctrl
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (endInclusive) {
return (start.line < pos.line || start.ch <= pos.ch) && // inclusive
(end.line > pos.line || end.ch >= pos.ch); // inclusive
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else {
return (start.line < pos.line || start.ch <= pos.ch) && // inclusive
(end.line > pos.line || end.ch > pos.ch); // exclusive
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76