adsabs/biblib-service

View on GitHub
biblib/views/user_view.py

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Function get_libraries has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get_libraries(cls, service_uid, absolute_uid, start=0, rows=None, sort_col="date_created", sort_order="desc", access_type="all"):
        """
        Get all the libraries a user has
        :param service_uid: microservice UID of the user
        :param absolute_uid: unique UID of the user in the API
Severity: Minor
Found in biblib/views/user_view.py - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File user_view.py has 271 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

"""
User view
"""

from biblib.utils import err, get_post_data, check_boolean
Severity: Minor
Found in biblib/views/user_view.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Function get_libraries has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def get_libraries(cls, service_uid, absolute_uid, start=0, rows=None, sort_col="date_created", sort_order="desc", access_type="all"):
    Severity: Major
    Found in biblib/views/user_view.py - About 50 mins to fix

      Function get_user_libraries has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def get_user_libraries(cls, session, service_uid, sort_col, sort_order, access_type, start=0, rows=None):
      Severity: Major
      Found in biblib/views/user_view.py - About 50 mins to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this function.
        Open

                    return library_dict, 200
        Severity: Major
        Found in biblib/views/user_view.py - About 30 mins to fix

          Function post has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def post(self):
                  """
                  HTTP POST request that creates a library for a given user
          
                  :return: the response for if the library was successfully created
          Severity: Minor
          Found in biblib/views/user_view.py - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          if response.status_code != 200:
                              current_app.logger.error('Could not find user in the API'
                                                       'database: {0}.'.format(owner_absolute_uid))
                              owner = 'Not available'
                          else:
          Severity: Major
          Found in biblib/views/user_view.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
          biblib/views/base_view.py on lines 779..784

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 62.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  elif access_type == 'collaborator': 
                      query = query.filter(Permissions.permissions['owner'].astext.cast(Boolean).is_(False))
          Severity: Minor
          Found in biblib/views/user_view.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
          biblib/views/user_view.py on lines 69..70

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 33.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if access_type == 'owner':
                      query = query.filter(Permissions.permissions['owner'].astext.cast(Boolean).is_(True))
          Severity: Minor
          Found in biblib/views/user_view.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
          biblib/views/user_view.py on lines 71..72

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 33.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status