File v1.go has 1065 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package web3
import (
"bytes"
"crypto/sha256"Web3APIv1 has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Web3APIv1 struct {
rpc *rpc.AergoRPCService
request *http.Request
handlerMap map[string]map[string]APIHandlerMethod Web3APIv1.ListEvents has 64 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) ListEvents() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetReceipts has 61 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetReceipts() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetVotes has 55 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetVotes() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.ListBlockHeaders has 55 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) ListBlockHeaders() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetState has 54 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetState() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetReceipts has 9 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetReceipts() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.ListBlockHeaders has 9 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) ListBlockHeaders() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.ListEvents has 8 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) ListEvents() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetVotes has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetVotes() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetBlockBody has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetBlockBody() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.ListEvents has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) ListEvents() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Web3APIv1.ListBlockMetadata has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) ListBlockMetadata() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetStateAndProof has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetStateAndProof() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetNameInfo has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetNameInfo() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetTX has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetTX() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.QueryContractState has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) QueryContractState() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.QueryContract has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) QueryContract() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetPeers has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetPeers() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetReceipt has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetReceipt() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetBlockTransactionCount has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetBlockTransactionCount() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetBalance has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetBalance() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetVotes has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetVotes() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Web3APIv1.GetBlock has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetBlock() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.CommitTX has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) CommitTX() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
body, err := io.ReadAll(api.request.Body)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetBlockMetadata has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetBlockMetadata() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetState has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetState() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Method Web3APIv1.GetAccountVotes has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetAccountVotes() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetBlock() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 374.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetBlockMetadata() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 374.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetBlockTransactionCount() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 374.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetBalance() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 295.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetAccountVotes() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 295.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetABI() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 262.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetStaking() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
values, err := url.ParseQuery(api.request.URL.RawQuery)
if err != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, err), true
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 262.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) ChainStat() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
request := &types.Empty{}
result, err := api.rpc.ChainStat(api.request.Context(), request)
if err != nil {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 136.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetChainInfo() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
request := &types.Empty{}
result, err := api.rpc.GetChainInfo(api.request.Context(), request)
if err != nil {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 136.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *Web3APIv1) GetConsensusInfo() (handler http.Handler, ok bool) {
request := &types.Empty{}
result, err := api.rpc.GetConsensusInfo(api.request.Context(), request)
if err != nil {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 136.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if size != "" {
sizeValue, parseErr := strconv.ParseUint(size, 10, 64)
if parseErr != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, parseErr), true
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 101.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if size != "" {
sizeValue, parseErr := strconv.ParseUint(size, 10, 64)
if parseErr != nil {
return commonResponseHandler(&types.Empty{}, parseErr), true
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 101.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76