Sign upLogin

afimb/cvdtc

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 145 of 145 total issues

Possible information leak / session hijack vulnerability
Open

    rack (1.6.4)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2019-16782

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-hrqr-hxpp-chr3

Solution: upgrade to ~> 1.6.12, >= 2.0.8

File Content Disclosure in Action View
Open

    actionview (4.2.7.1)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2019-5418

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/pFRKI96Sm8Q

Solution: upgrade to >= 4.2.11.1, ~> 4.2.11, >= 5.0.7.2, ~> 5.0.7, >= 5.1.6.2, ~> 5.1.6, >= 5.2.2.1, ~> 5.2.2, >= 6.0.0.beta3

Broken Access Control vulnerability in Active Job
Open

    activejob (4.2.7.1)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-16476

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/FL4dSdzr2zw

Solution: upgrade to ~> 4.2.11, ~> 5.0.7.1, ~> 5.1.6.1, ~> 5.1.7, >= 5.2.1.1

Denial of Service Vulnerability in Action View
Open

    actionview (4.2.7.1)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2019-5419

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/GN7w9fFAQeI

Solution: upgrade to >= 6.0.0.beta3, >= 5.2.2.1, ~> 5.2.2, >= 5.1.6.2, ~> 5.1.6, >= 5.0.7.2, ~> 5.0.7, >= 4.2.11.1, ~> 4.2.11

ruby-ffi DDL loading issue on Windows OS
Open

    ffi (1.9.14)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-1000201

Criticality: High

URL: https://github.com/ffi/ffi/releases/tag/1.9.24

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.9.24

Path traversal is possible via backslash characters on Windows.
Open

    rack-protection (1.5.3)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-7212

URL: https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/pull/1379

Solution: upgrade to >= 2.0.1, ~> 1.5.4

rack-protection gem timing attack vulnerability when validating CSRF token
Open

    rack-protection (1.5.3)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-1000119

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://github.com/sinatra/rack-protection/pull/98

Solution: upgrade to ~> 1.5.5, >= 2.0.0

Path Traversal in Sprockets
Open

    sprockets (3.7.0)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-3760

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ruby-security-ann/2S9Pwz2i16k

Solution: upgrade to < 3.0.0, >= 2.12.5, < 4.0.0, >= 3.7.2, >= 4.0.0.beta8

XSS vulnerability in rails-html-sanitizer
Open

    rails-html-sanitizer (1.0.3)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-3741

URL: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-security/tP7W3kLc5u4/uDy2Br7xBgAJ

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.0.4

Possible XSS vulnerability in Rack
Open

    rack (1.6.4)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-16471

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ruby-security-ann/NAalCee8n6o

Solution: upgrade to ~> 1.6.11, >= 2.0.6

TZInfo relative path traversal vulnerability allows loading of arbitrary files
Open

    tzinfo (1.2.2)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-31163

Criticality: High

URL: https://github.com/tzinfo/tzinfo/security/advisories/GHSA-5cm2-9h8c-rvfx

Solution: upgrade to ~> 0.3.61, >= 1.2.10

Directory Traversal in rubyzip
Open

    rubyzip (1.2.0)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-1000544

Criticality: Critical

URL: https://github.com/rubyzip/rubyzip/issues/369

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.2.2

Directory traversal vulnerability in rubyzip
Open

    rubyzip (1.2.0)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2017-5946

Criticality: Critical

URL: https://github.com/rubyzip/rubyzip/issues/315

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.2.1

Potential remote code execution of user-provided local names in ActionView
Open

    actionview (4.2.7.1)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2020-8163

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/hWuKcHyoKh0

Solution: upgrade to >= 4.2.11.2

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      journey_pattern: {
        objectid: {
          unique: 0,
          pattern: 0,
          min_size: '',
Severity: Minor
Found in app/services/parameters_service.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
app/services/parameters_service.rb on lines 478..503

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 41.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      route: {
        objectid: {
          unique: 0,
          pattern: 0,
          min_size: '',
Severity: Minor
Found in app/services/parameters_service.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
app/services/parameters_service.rb on lines 505..530

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 41.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      access_link: {
        objectid: {
          unique: 0,
          pattern: 0,
          min_size: '',
Severity: Minor
Found in app/services/parameters_service.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
app/services/parameters_service.rb on lines 399..422

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      connection_link: {
        objectid: {
          unique: 0,
          pattern: 0,
          min_size: '',
Severity: Minor
Found in app/services/parameters_service.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
app/services/parameters_service.rb on lines 374..397

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method perform has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def perform(job_id)
    job = Job.find_waiting(job_id.to_i).first
    if job
      uri = URI(job.url)
      response = nil
Severity: Minor
Found in app/jobs/url_job.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Model attribute used in file name
Open

    File.open(job_tmp_file, 'wb') do |f|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/jobs/ievkit_job.rb by brakeman

Using user input when accessing files (local or remote) will raise a warning in Brakeman.

For example

File.open("/tmp/#{cookie[:file]}")

will raise an error like

Cookie value used in file name near line 4: File.open("/tmp/#{cookie[:file]}")

This type of vulnerability can be used to access arbitrary files on a server (including /etc/passwd.

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language