Sign upLogin

akuraru/Wara

View on GitHub
Star
lib/wara.rb

Summary

Maintainability
B
4 hrs
Test Coverage

Method create has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def create(model, to, lang = Lang::ObjC)
            to = File.dirname(model) unless to
            @xml = REXML::Document.new(open(File.expand_path("contents", model)))
            @objects = @xml.get_elements('model/entity')
            @entities = @objects.map{ |o|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wara.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method swift has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def swift(e)
            name = e["representedClassName"]
            entity = e["parentEntity"]
            init = entity ? "[super initWithEntity:entity]" : "[super init]"
            parentEntity = entity ? ": #{entity}Wrapper" : ": NSObject"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wara.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method implementation has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def implementation(e)
            name = e["representedClassName"]
            init = e["parentEntity"] ? "[super initWithEntity:entity]" : "[super init]"
            getter = e["parentEntity"] ? "- (BloodPressure *)entity {\n    return (BloodPressure *) [super entity];\n}\n\n" : ""
            first = e["parentEntity"] ? "" : "        _entity = entity;\n"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wara.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method output_objc has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def output_objc(entities, to)
            entities.map {|e|
                file_name = e["representedClassName"]
                hw = header(e)
                File.write( File.expand_path("_#{file_name}Wrapper.h", to), hw)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wara.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method header has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def header(e)
            name = e["representedClassName"]
            entity = e["parentEntity"]
            import = entity ? "\#import \"#{entity}Wrapper.h\"\n" : "#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>\n"
            parentEntity = entity ? "#{entity}Wrapper" : "NSObject"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wara.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def entityType(value)
            {
                "Boolean"=>"NSNumber *",
                "Binary"=>"NSData *",
                "Date"=>"NSDate *",
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wara.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/wara.rb on lines 149..162

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def entitySwiftType(value)
            {
                "Boolean"=>"NSNumber?",
                "Binary"=>"NSData?",
                "Date"=>"NSDate?",
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wara.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/wara.rb on lines 112..125

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status