Showing 4 of 31 total issues
Slackscot
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
type Slackscot struct {
name string
config *viper.Viper
defaultAction Answerer
plugins []*Plugin
Function newInstrumenter
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func newInstrumenter(appName string, meter metric.Meter, latencyCallback metric.Int64ObserverFunc) (ins *instrumenter, err error) {
ins = new(instrumenter)
defaultLabels := []label.KeyValue{label.String("name", appName)}
Method Karma.recordKarma
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func (k *Karma) recordKarma(message *slackscot.IncomingMessage) *slackscot.Answer {
matches := karmaRegex.FindAllStringSubmatch(message.Text, -1)
answerText := ""
for idx, match := range matches {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function New
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func New(name string, v *viper.Viper, options ...Option) (s *Slackscot, err error) {
s = new(Slackscot)
s.triggeringMsgToResponse, err = lru.NewARC(v.GetInt(config.ResponseCacheSizeKey))
if err != nil {