Showing 88 of 88 total issues
Method make_api_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_api_request(query)
uri = URI.parse(query_url(query))
Geocoder.log(:debug, "Geocoder: HTTP request being made for #{uri.to_s}")
http_client.start(uri.host, uri.port, use_ssl: use_ssl?, open_timeout: configuration.timeout, read_timeout: configuration.timeout) do |client|
configure_ssl!(client) if use_ssl?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method within_bounding_box
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def within_bounding_box(sw_lat, sw_lng, ne_lat, ne_lng, lat_attr, lon_attr)
Method full_distance
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def full_distance(latitude, longitude, lat_attr, lon_attr, options = {})
Method approx_bearing
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def approx_bearing(latitude, longitude, lat_attr, lon_attr, options = {})
Method select_clause
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def select_clause(columns, distance = nil, bearing = nil, distance_column = 'distance', bearing_column = 'bearing')
Method approx_distance
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def approx_distance(latitude, longitude, lat_attr, lon_attr, options = {})
Method full_bearing
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def full_bearing(latitude, longitude, lat_attr, lon_attr, options = {})
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def results(query)
# don't look up a loopback or private address, just return the stored result
return [reserved_result(query.text)] if query.internal_ip_address?
return [] unless doc = fetch_data(query)
if doc["response"] == "INVALID ACCOUNT"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def results(query)
# don't look up a loopback or private address, just return the stored result
return [reserved_result(query.text)] if query.internal_ip_address?
return [] unless doc = fetch_data(query)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def results(query)
# don't look up a loopback or private address, just return the stored result
return [reserved_result(query.text)] if query.internal_ip_address?
return [] unless doc = fetch_data(query)
if doc["response"] == "INVALID ACCOUNT"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method parse_json
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_json(data)
if defined?(ActiveSupport::JSON)
ActiveSupport::JSON.decode(data)
else
JSON.parse(data)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method http_client
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def http_client
proxy_name = "#{protocol}_proxy"
if proxy = configuration.send(proxy_name)
proxy_url = !!(proxy =~ /^#{protocol}/) ? proxy : protocol + '://' + proxy
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method results
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def results(query)
return [] unless doc = fetch_data(query)
if doc['meta'] && doc['meta']['error']
Geocoder.log(:warn, "2gis Geocoding API error: #{doc['meta']["code"]} (#{doc['meta']['error']["message"]}).")
return []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method results
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def results(query)
return [] unless doc = fetch_data(query)
if !doc.is_a?(Array)
case doc['error']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method results
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def results(query)
# don't look up a loopback or private address, just return the stored result
return [reserved_result] if query.internal_ip_address?
doc = fetch_data(query)
if doc and doc.is_a?(Array)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method results
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def results(query)
return [] unless doc = fetch_data(query)
if doc['error'].nil?
[doc]
# The API returned a 404 response, which indicates no results found
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method geocoder_reject_non_ipv4_addresses
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def geocoder_reject_non_ipv4_addresses(ip_addresses)
ips = []
for ip in ip_addresses
begin
valid_ip = IPAddr.new(ip)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method geocode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def geocode
do_lookup(false) do |o,rs|
if r = rs.first
unless r.latitude.nil? or r.longitude.nil?
o.__send__ "#{self.class.geocoder_options[:latitude]}=", r.latitude
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method results
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def results(query)
return [] unless (doc = fetch_data(query))
return [] unless doc['type'] == 'FeatureCollection'
return [] unless doc['features'] || doc['features'].present?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return []