amazing-print/amazing_print

View on GitHub
lib/amazing_print/formatters/mswin_helper.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
1 hr
Test Coverage

Method mode has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def mode
        r = ['-'] * 6
        r[0] = 'd' if @stat.directory?
        r[1] = 'a' unless (@attrs & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_ARCHIVE).zero?
        r[2] = 'r' unless (@attrs & FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY).zero?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/amazing_print/formatters/mswin_helper.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Reverse the order of the operands __FILE__ == $PROGRAM_NAME.
Open

puts AmazingPrint::Formatters::GetChildItem.new ARGV[0] if __FILE__ == $PROGRAM_NAME

This cop checks for Yoda conditions, i.e. comparison operations where readability is reduced because the operands are not ordered the same way as they would be ordered in spoken English.

Example: EnforcedStyle: allcomparisonoperators (default)

# bad
99 == foo
"bar" != foo
42 >= foo
10 < bar

# good
foo == 99
foo == "bar"
foo <= 42
bar > 10

Example: EnforcedStyle: equalityoperatorsonly

# bad
99 == foo
"bar" != foo

# good
99 >= foo
3 < a && a < 5

Redundant curly braces around a hash parameter.
Open

               {
                 Mode: mode,
                 LastWriteTime: last_write_time,
                 Length: length,
                 Name: name

This cop checks for braces around the last parameter in a method call if the last parameter is a hash. It supports braces, no_braces and context_dependent styles.

Example: EnforcedStyle: braces

# The `braces` style enforces braces around all method
# parameters that are hashes.

# bad
some_method(x, y, a: 1, b: 2)

# good
some_method(x, y, {a: 1, b: 2})

Example: EnforcedStyle: no_braces (default)

# The `no_braces` style checks that the last parameter doesn't
# have braces around it.

# bad
some_method(x, y, {a: 1, b: 2})

# good
some_method(x, y, a: 1, b: 2)

Example: EnforcedStyle: context_dependent

# The `context_dependent` style checks that the last parameter
# doesn't have braces around it, but requires braces if the
# second to last parameter is also a hash literal.

# bad
some_method(x, y, {a: 1, b: 2})
some_method(x, y, {a: 1, b: 2}, a: 1, b: 2)

# good
some_method(x, y, a: 1, b: 2)
some_method(x, y, {a: 1, b: 2}, {a: 1, b: 2})

Prefer annotated tokens (like %<foo>s</foo>) over unannotated tokens (like %s).
Open

        @stat.mtime.strftime '%Y-%m-%d     %H:%M'

Use a consistent style for named format string tokens.

Note: unannotated style cop only works for strings which are passed as arguments to those methods: sprintf, format, %. The reason is that unannotated format is very similar to encoded URLs or Date/Time formatting strings.

Example: EnforcedStyle: annotated (default)

# bad
format('%{greeting}', greeting: 'Hello')
format('%s', 'Hello')

# good
format('%<greeting>s', greeting: 'Hello')</greeting>

Example: EnforcedStyle: template

# bad
format('%<greeting>s', greeting: 'Hello')
format('%s', 'Hello')

# good
format('%{greeting}', greeting: 'Hello')</greeting>

Example: EnforcedStyle: unannotated

# bad
format('%<greeting>s', greeting: 'Hello')
format('%{greeting}', 'Hello')

# good
format('%s', 'Hello')</greeting>

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status