andypike/rectify

Advisory: CVE-2022-23517

Criticality: High

URL: https://github.com/rails/rails-html-sanitizer/security/advisories/GHSA-5x79-w82f-gw8w

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.4.4

Advisory: CVE-2021-30560

Criticality: High

URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-fq42-c5rg-92c2

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.2

Advisory:

URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-2qc6-mcvw-92cw

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.9

Advisory: CVE-2018-25032

Criticality: High

URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/security/advisories/GHSA-v6gp-9mmm-c6p5

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.13.4

Advisory: CVE-2019-5477

Criticality: Critical

URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/issues/1915

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.10.4

Advisory: CVE-2022-23519

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://github.com/rails/rails-html-sanitizer/security/advisories/GHSA-9h9g-93gc-623h

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.4.4

Advisory: CVE-2020-8164

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/f6ioe4sdpbY

Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.4.3, ~> 5.2.4, >= 6.0.3.1

Advisory: CVE-2019-5418

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/pFRKI96Sm8Q

Solution: upgrade to >= 4.2.11.1, ~> 4.2.11, >= 5.0.7.2, ~> 5.0.7, >= 5.1.6.2, ~> 5.1.6, >= 5.2.2.1, ~> 5.2.2, >= 6.0.0.beta3

A method with Too Many Statements is any method that has a large number of lines.

Too Many Statements warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if, else, case, when, for, while, until, begin, rescue) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.

So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:

def parse(arg, argv, &error)
  if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
    return nil, block, nil                                         # +1
  end
  opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1]                          # +2
  val = conv_arg(*val)                                             # +3
  if opt and !arg
    argv.shift                                                     # +4
  else
    val[0] = nil                                                   # +5
  end
  val                                                              # +6
end

(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)

Feature Envy occurs when a code fragment references another object more often than it references itself, or when several clients do the same series of manipulations on a particular type of object.

Feature Envy reduces the code's ability to communicate intent: code that "belongs" on one class but which is located in another can be hard to find, and may upset the "System of Names" in the host class.

Feature Envy also affects the design's flexibility: A code fragment that is in the wrong class creates couplings that may not be natural within the application's domain, and creates a loss of cohesion in the unwilling host class.

Feature Envy often arises because it must manipulate other objects (usually its arguments) to get them into a useful form, and one force preventing them (the arguments) doing this themselves is that the common knowledge lives outside the arguments, or the arguments are of too basic a type to justify extending that type. Therefore there must be something which 'knows' about the contents or purposes of the arguments. That thing would have to be more than just a basic type, because the basic types are either containers which don't know about their contents, or they are single objects which can't capture their relationship with their fellows of the same type. So, this thing with the extra knowledge should be reified into a class, and the utility method will most likely belong there.

Example

Running Reek on:

class Warehouse
  def sale_price(item)
    (item.price - item.rebate) * @vat
  end
end

would report:

Warehouse#total_price refers to item more than self (FeatureEnvy)

since this:

(item.price - item.rebate)

belongs to the Item class, not the Warehouse.

Advisory: CVE-2020-8166

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/NOjKiGeXUgw

Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.4.3, ~> 5.2.4, >= 6.0.3.1

Advisory: CVE-2018-16468

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://github.com/flavorjones/loofah/issues/154

Solution: upgrade to >= 2.2.3

Advisory: CVE-2022-30123

Criticality: Critical

URL: https://groups.google.com/g/ruby-security-ann/c/LWB10kWzag8

Solution: upgrade to >= 2.0.9.1, ~> 2.0.9, >= 2.1.4.1, ~> 2.1.4, >= 2.2.3.1

Advisory: CVE-2022-23633

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/g/ruby-security-ann/c/FkTM-_7zSNA/m/K2RiMJBlBAAJ

Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.6.2, ~> 5.2.6, >= 6.0.4.6, ~> 6.0.4, >= 6.1.4.6, ~> 6.1.4, >= 7.0.2.2

Advisory: CVE-2020-5267

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/55reWMM_Pg8

Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.4.2, ~> 5.2.4, >= 6.0.2.2

Advisory: CVE-2021-22885

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/g/rubyonrails-security/c/NiQl-48cXYI

Solution: upgrade to ~> 5.2.4.6, ~> 5.2.6, >= 6.0.3.7, ~> 6.0.3, >= 6.1.3.2

Advisory: CVE-2022-27777

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://groups.google.com/g/ruby-security-ann/c/9wJPEDv-iRw

Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.7.1, ~> 5.2.7, >= 6.0.4.8, ~> 6.0.4, >= 6.1.5.1, ~> 6.1.5, >= 7.0.2.4

Advisory: CVE-2019-5419

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/GN7w9fFAQeI

Solution: upgrade to >= 6.0.0.beta3, >= 5.2.2.1, ~> 5.2.2, >= 5.1.6.2, ~> 5.1.6, >= 5.0.7.2, ~> 5.0.7, >= 4.2.11.1, ~> 4.2.11

Advisory: CVE-2023-22796

URL: https://github.com/rails/rails/releases/tag/v7.0.4.1

Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.8.15, ~> 5.2.8, >= 6.1.7.1, ~> 6.1.7, >= 7.0.4.1