Issues - angular/angular.js

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

goog.i18n.DateTimeSymbols_de_AT = {
  ERAS: ['v. Chr.', 'n. Chr.'],
  ERANAMES: ['v. Chr.', 'n. Chr.'],
  NARROWMONTHS: ['J', 'F', 'M', 'A', 'M', 'J', 'J', 'A', 'S', 'O', 'N', 'D'],
  STANDALONENARROWMONTHS: ['J', 'F', 'M', 'A', 'M', 'J', 'J', 'A', 'S', 'O', 'N', 'D'],

Found in i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js and 97 other locations - About 1 day to fix

Read up
Read up

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 179..203

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 209..233

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 270..294

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 300..324

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 330..354

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 360..384

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 421..445

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 451..475

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 481..505

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 511..535

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 541..565

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 571..595

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 601..625

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 631..655

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 697..721

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 727..751

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 757..781

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 787..811

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 817..841

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 847..871

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 877..901

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 907..931

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 943..967

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 973..997

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1003..1027

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1039..1063

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1069..1093

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1099..1123

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1129..1153

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1190..1214

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1220..1244

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1250..1274

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1280..1304

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1310..1334

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1340..1364

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1370..1394

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1400..1424

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1430..1454

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1460..1484

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1490..1514

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1520..1544

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1550..1574

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1580..1604

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1610..1634

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1640..1664

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1670..1694

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1700..1724

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1730..1754

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1760..1784

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1790..1814

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1820..1844

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1850..1874

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1880..1904

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1910..1934

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1940..1964

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 1970..1994

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2000..2024

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2030..2054

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2060..2084

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2090..2114

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2120..2144

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2150..2174

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2180..2204

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2241..2265

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2271..2295

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2332..2356

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2393..2417

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2423..2447

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2459..2483

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2489..2513

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2519..2543

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2549..2573

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2585..2609

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2615..2639

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2645..2669

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2675..2699

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2705..2729

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2735..2759

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2765..2789

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2795..2819

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2825..2849

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2855..2879

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2885..2909

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2915..2939

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2945..2969

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 2975..2999

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 3005..3029

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 3035..3059

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 3065..3089

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 3095..3119

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 3125..3149

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 3155..3179

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 3185..3209

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 3215..3239

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 3251..3275

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 3281..3305

i18n/closure/datetimeSymbols.js on lines 3311..3335

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 298.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

angular/angular.js

Showing 4,250 of 4,250 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring. Open

Duplicated Code

Tuning

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

Similar blocks of code found in 98 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open