Showing 4 of 4 total issues
Method ordered_fields has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ordered_fields
return {} if self.class.attr_order.blank?
new_hash = {}
for attribute in self.class.attr_order
value = send(attribute)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ref_to has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ref_to attribute_prefix, name_length=nil
attribute_name = "#{attribute_prefix}_ref".to_sym
@attr_order ||= Set.new
@attr_order << attribute_name
attr_accessor attribute_name- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compact has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compact opts={}
# I pass two times to avoid {v: '1',k: {}}, gotta find a better algorithm (recursive)
return {} if opts.nil?
proc = Proc.new { |k, v| v.kind_of?(Hash) ? (v.delete_if(&proc); nil) : (v == nil || (v.respond_to?(:empty) && v.empty?)) };
hash = opts.delete_if(&proc)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate record
return true if record.class.attr_order.blank?
for field in record.class.attr_order
value = record.send(field)
if value.respond_to?(:valid?) and value.invalid?- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"