File FileAdapterStrategy.php
has 311 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* apparat-object
*
The class FileAdapterStrategy has an overall complexity of 67 which is very high. The configured complexity threshold is 50. Open
class FileAdapterStrategy extends AbstractAdapterStrategy
{
/**
* Adapter strategy type
*
- Exclude checks
Method findObjectResourceLocators
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function findObjectResourceLocators(SelectorInterface $selector, RepositoryInterface $repository)
{
chdir($this->root);
// Build a glob string from the selector
Function findObjectResourceLocators
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function findObjectResourceLocators(SelectorInterface $selector, RepositoryInterface $repository)
{
chdir($this->root);
// Build a glob string from the selector
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method createObjectResource
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function createObjectResource(\Closure $creator)
{
$sizeDescriptor = null;
try {
Function createObjectResource
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function createObjectResource(\Closure $creator)
{
$sizeDescriptor = null;
try {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function initializeRepository
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function initializeRepository()
{
// Successively create the repository directories
$repoDirectories = [$this->config['root'], $this->config['root'].DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR.'.repo'];
foreach ($repoDirectories as $repoDirectory) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
The method findObjectResourceLocators() has an NPath complexity of 61440. The configured NPath complexity threshold is 200. Open
public function findObjectResourceLocators(SelectorInterface $selector, RepositoryInterface $repository)
{
chdir($this->root);
// Build a glob string from the selector
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
NPathComplexity
Since: 0.1
The NPath complexity of a method is the number of acyclic execution paths through that method. A threshold of 200 is generally considered the point where measures should be taken to reduce complexity.
Example
class Foo {
function bar() {
// lots of complicated code
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#npathcomplexity
The method findObjectResourceLocators() has a Cyclomatic Complexity of 20. The configured cyclomatic complexity threshold is 10. Open
public function findObjectResourceLocators(SelectorInterface $selector, RepositoryInterface $repository)
{
chdir($this->root);
// Build a glob string from the selector
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CyclomaticComplexity
Since: 0.1
Complexity is determined by the number of decision points in a method plus one for the method entry. The decision points are 'if', 'while', 'for', and 'case labels'. Generally, 1-4 is low complexity, 5-7 indicates moderate complexity, 8-10 is high complexity, and 11+ is very high complexity.
Example
// Cyclomatic Complexity = 11
class Foo {
1 public function example() {
2 if ($a == $b) {
3 if ($a1 == $b1) {
fiddle();
4 } elseif ($a2 == $b2) {
fiddle();
} else {
fiddle();
}
5 } elseif ($c == $d) {
6 while ($c == $d) {
fiddle();
}
7 } elseif ($e == $f) {
8 for ($n = 0; $n < $h; $n++) {
fiddle();
}
} else {
switch ($z) {
9 case 1:
fiddle();
break;
10 case 2:
fiddle();
break;
11 case 3:
fiddle();
break;
default:
fiddle();
break;
}
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#cyclomaticcomplexity
The class FileAdapterStrategy has a coupling between objects value of 22. Consider to reduce the number of dependencies under 13. Open
class FileAdapterStrategy extends AbstractAdapterStrategy
{
/**
* Adapter strategy type
*
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CouplingBetweenObjects
Since: 1.1.0
A class with too many dependencies has negative impacts on several quality aspects of a class. This includes quality criteria like stability, maintainability and understandability
Example
class Foo {
/**
* @var \foo\bar\X
*/
private $x = null;
/**
* @var \foo\bar\Y
*/
private $y = null;
/**
* @var \foo\bar\Z
*/
private $z = null;
public function setFoo(\Foo $foo) {}
public function setBar(\Bar $bar) {}
public function setBaz(\Baz $baz) {}
/**
* @return \SplObjectStorage
* @throws \OutOfRangeException
* @throws \InvalidArgumentException
* @throws \ErrorException
*/
public function process(\Iterator $it) {}
// ...
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/design.html#couplingbetweenobjects
Remove error control operator '@' on line 164. Open
public function __construct(array $config)
{
parent::__construct($config, ['root']);
// If the root directory configuration is empty
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
ErrorControlOperator
Error suppression should be avoided if possible as it doesn't just suppress the error, that you are trying to stop, but will also suppress errors that you didn't predict would ever occur. Consider changing error_reporting() level and/or setting up your own error handler.
Example
function foo($filePath) {
$file = @fopen($filPath); // hides exceptions
$key = @$array[$notExistingKey]; // assigns null to $key
}
Source http://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#errorcontroloperator
Remove error control operator '@' on line 554. Open
protected function publishObject(ObjectInterface $object)
{
$objectRepoLocator = $object->getRepositoryLocator();
// If the object had been persisted as a draft: Remove the draft resource
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
ErrorControlOperator
Error suppression should be avoided if possible as it doesn't just suppress the error, that you are trying to stop, but will also suppress errors that you didn't predict would ever occur. Consider changing error_reporting() level and/or setting up your own error handler.
Example
function foo($filePath) {
$file = @fopen($filPath); // hides exceptions
$key = @$array[$notExistingKey]; // assigns null to $key
}
Source http://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#errorcontroloperator
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
protected function undeleteObject(ObjectInterface $object)
{
// Hide object directory
$objContainerDir = dirname(dirname($this->getAbsoluteResourcePath($object->getRepositoryLocator())));
$objContainerName = $object->getId()->getId().'-'.$object->getObjectType()->getType();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 194.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
protected function deleteObject(ObjectInterface $object)
{
// Hide object directory
$objContainerDir = dirname(dirname($this->getAbsoluteResourcePath($object->getRepositoryLocator())));
$objContainerName = $object->getId()->getId().'-'.$object->getObjectType()->getType();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 194.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76