File eac_base_map.rb
has 1132 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module EACBaseMap
def EAC_BASE_MAP(opts = {:import_events => false})
import_events = opts[:import_events]
{
Method agent_date_range_map
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_date_range_map(label = nil, rel = :dates)
{
:obj => :structured_date_label,
:rel => rel,
:map => {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method agent_person_name_components_map
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_person_name_components_map
{
'self::nameEntry[@lang]' => proc { |name, node|
name[:language] = node.attr('lang')
},
Method agent_corporate_entity_name_components_map
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_corporate_entity_name_components_map
{
'self::nameEntry[@lang]' => proc { |name, node|
name[:language] = node.attr('lang')
},
Method agent_family_name_components_map
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_family_name_components_map
{
'self::nameEntry[@lang]' => proc { |name, node|
name[:language] = node.attr('lang')
},
Method agent_date_range_map
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_date_range_map(label = nil, rel = :dates)
{
:obj => :structured_date_label,
:rel => rel,
:map => {
Method agent_record_control_map
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_record_control_map
{
:obj => :agent_record_control,
:rel => :agent_record_controls,
:map => {
Method related_resource_map
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def related_resource_map
{
:obj => :agent_resource,
:rel => :agent_resources,
:map => {
Method agent_date_single_map
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_date_single_map(label = nil, rel = :dates)
{
:obj => :structured_date_label,
:rel => rel,
:map => {
Method related_agent_map
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def related_agent_map(type)
{
:obj => :"agent_#{type}",
:rel => proc { |agent, rel_agent|
agent[:related_agents] << {
Method agent_date_single_map
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_date_single_map(label = nil, rel = :dates)
{
:obj => :structured_date_label,
:rel => rel,
:map => {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method agent_bioghist_note_map
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_bioghist_note_map
{
:obj => :note_bioghist,
:rel => :notes,
:map => {
Method find_relationship
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_relationship(node, type)
relationship = node.attr('cpfRelationType')
case relationship
when 'identity'
Method agent_maintenance_history_map
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_maintenance_history_map
{
:obj => :agent_maintenance_history,
:rel => :agent_maintenance_histories,
:map => {
Method base_map_subfields
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def base_map_subfields(import_events)
h = {
'//eac-cpf//control/recordId' => agent_record_identifiers_map,
'//eac-cpf//control/otherRecordId' => agent_other_record_identifiers_map,
'//eac-cpf//control' => agent_record_control_map,
Method create_chron_item
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_chron_item(node)
items = []
node.search('./chronItem').each do |n|
if (d = n.at_xpath('dateRange'))
date = format_content(d.at_xpath('fromDate').inner_text)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method hierarchical_relationship
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def hierarchical_relationship(hierarchy, node, type)
if pers_match?(node, type) || fam_match?(node, type)
case hierarchy
when 'parent'
relator = 'is_parent_of'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
'self::source' => proc { |s, node|
s[:file_uri] = node.attr('href')
s[:file_version_xlink_actuate_attribute] = node.attr('actuate')
s[:file_version_xlink_show_attribute] = node.attr('show')
s[:xlink_title_attribute] = node.attr('title')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
'self::setComponent' => proc { |as, node|
as[:file_uri] = node.attr('href')
as[:file_version_xlink_actuate_attribute] = node.attr('actuate')
as[:file_version_xlink_show_attribute] = node.attr('show')
as[:xlink_title_attribute] = node.attr('title')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_legal_status_note_map
{
:obj => :note_legal_status,
:rel => :notes,
:map => {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_mandate_note_map
{
:obj => :note_mandate,
:rel => :notes,
:map => {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_structure_note_map
{
:obj => :note_structure_or_genealogy,
:rel => :notes,
:map => {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_general_context_note_map
{
:obj => :note_general_context,
:rel => :notes,
:map => {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76