File worklog_report.rb
has 468 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class WorklogReport
include ERB::Util
PIVOT = 1
AUDIT = 2
Method init_rows_and_columns
has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def init_rows_and_columns
@total = 0
@row_totals = {}
@column_totals = {}
@column_headers = {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_csv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_csv
csv_string = ''
if @column_headers
CSV.generate(csv_string, :col_sep => ',') do |csv|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method key_from_worklog
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def key_from_worklog(w, r)
if r == 1
"#{w.customer.name} #{w.project.name} #{w.task.name} #{w.task.task_num}"
elsif r == 2
w.is_a?(Tag) ? w.id : 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method name_from_worklog
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def name_from_worklog(w, r)
if r == 1
"#{w.task.issue_num} <a href=\"/tasks/view/#{w.task.task_num}\">#{ERB::Util.h w.task.name}</a> <br /><small>#{ERB::Util.h w.task.full_name}</small>".html_safe
elsif r == 2
w.is_a?(Tag) ? "#{w.name}" : I18n.t('worklog_reports.status.none')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_column
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_column(w, key)
@column_totals[key] += w.duration unless ['comment', '1_start', '2_end', '3_task', '4_note'].include?(key)
rkey = key_from_worklog(w, 15).to_s
row_name = name_from_worklog(w, 1)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_row
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_row(rkey, rname, vkey, duration)
unless @rows[rkey]
@rows[rkey] ||= {}
@row_totals[rkey] ||= 0
@rows[rkey]['__'] = rname
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method init_rows_and_columns
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def init_rows_and_columns
@total = 0
@row_totals = {}
@column_totals = {}
@column_headers = {}
Method do_column
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_column(w, key)
@column_totals[key] += w.duration unless ['comment', '1_start', '2_end', '3_task', '4_note'].include?(key)
rkey = key_from_worklog(w, 15).to_s
row_name = name_from_worklog(w, 1)
Method key_from_worklog
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def key_from_worklog(w, r)
if r == 1
"#{w.customer.name} #{w.project.name} #{w.task.name} #{w.task.task_num}"
elsif r == 2
w.is_a?(Tag) ? w.id : 0
Method range
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def range
return @range if @range
# Swap to an appropriate range based on entries returned
start_date = self.start_date
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method init_start_and_end_dates
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def init_start_and_end_dates(params)
range = params[:range].to_i
case range
when 0
# Today
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method name_from_worklog
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def name_from_worklog(w, r)
if r == 1
"#{w.task.issue_num} <a href=\"/tasks/view/#{w.task.task_num}\">#{ERB::Util.h w.task.name}</a> <br /><small>#{ERB::Util.h w.task.full_name}</small>".html_safe
elsif r == 2
w.is_a?(Tag) ? "#{w.name}" : I18n.t('worklog_reports.status.none')
Method init_start_and_end_dates
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def init_start_and_end_dates(params)
range = params[:range].to_i
case range
when 0
# Today
Method create_csv
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_csv
csv_string = ''
if @column_headers
CSV.generate(csv_string, :col_sep => ',') do |csv|
Method get_days_of_week_header
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_days_of_week_header(w)
if [0, 1, 2].include? @range.to_i
I18n.l(tz.utc_to_local(w.started_at), format: '%a <br/>%d/%m').html_safe
elsif [3, 4].include? @range.to_i
if tz.utc_to_local(w.started_at).beginning_of_week.month != tz.utc_to_local(w.started_at).beginning_of_week.since(6.days).month
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method init_work_logs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def init_work_logs(tasks, params)
logs = []
ids = tasks.collect { |t| t.id }
logs = WorkLog.level_accessed_by(current_user).where('task_id in (?)', ids).includes(:project, :_user_, :customer, :company => [:custom_attributes], :task => [:tags, :milestone])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
body += "<option value='2' #{selected='selected' if w.rejected? } >#{I18n.t('work_logs.status.rejected')}</option>"
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
body += "<option value='1' #{selected='selected' if w.approved? } >#{I18n.t('work_logs.status.approved')}</option>"
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
body += "<option value='0' #{selected='selected' if w.status.to_i.zero? } >--</option>"
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(controller, params)
tasks = []
if params[:filter_project].to_i > 0
tasks = Project.find(params[:filter_project]).tasks
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(I18n.t('shared.week') + "#{tz.utc_to_local(w.started_at).strftime('%W').to_i + 1} <br/>" +
I18n.l(tz.utc_to_local(w.started_at).beginning_of_month, format: '%d/%m') + ' - ' +
I18n.l(tz.utc_to_local(w.started_at).beginning_of_week.since(6.days), format: '%d/%m')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(I18n.t('shared.week') + "#{tz.utc_to_local(w.started_at).strftime('%W').to_i + 1} <br/>" +
I18n.l(tz.utc_to_local(w.started_at).beginning_of_week, format: '%d/%m') + ' - ' +
I18n.l(tz.utc_to_local(w.started_at).beginning_of_week.since(6.days), format: '%d/%m')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"#{w.task.issue_num} <a href=\"/tasks/view/#{w.task.task_num}\">#{ERB::Util.h w.task.name}</a> <br /><small>#{ERB::Util.h w.task.full_name}</small>".html_safe
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
do_row(rkey, row_name, key, "#{w.task.issue_num} <a href=\"/tasks/view/#{w.task.task_num}\">#{ERB::Util.h w.task.name}</a> <br/><small>#{ERB::Util.h w.task.full_name}</small>".html_safe)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76