Showing 134 of 134 total issues
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(options)
username = options[:user_name]
@conn.create_user(username, options[:path] ||= '/')
puts "Created User: #{username}"
if options[:password]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File s3.rb
has 270 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Awscli
module S3
require 'thread'
require 'digest/md5'
require 'base64'
File instances.rb
has 270 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module AwsCli
module CLI
module EC2
require 'awscli/cli/ec2'
require 'awscli/helper'
Method terminate_instances
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def terminate_instances(delete_attached_volumes = false)
block_mappings = []
if agree('Are you sure want to delete all the servers that are running ? ')
@conn.servers.all.each do |server|
server.destroy if server.state == 'running' || server.state == 'stopped'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(options)
# => validate & parse options
opts = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(options))
#launch conf name
abort "Launch configuration name not found: #{options[:launch_configuration_name]}" unless @conn.configurations.get(options[:launch_configuration_name])
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if options[:expected_attr] #-a
expected_attr_name, expected_attr_type, expected_attr_value = options[:expected_attr].split(':')
if expected_attr_name and expected_attr_type and expected_attr_value
if options[:expected_exists] and options[:expected_exists] == 'true' #-a Id:S:001 -e true
opts['Expected'] = { expected_attr_name => { 'Value' => { expected_attr_type => expected_attr_value }, 'Exists' => options[:expected_exists] } }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 88.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if options[:expected_attr] #-a
expected_attr_name, expected_attr_type, expected_attr_value = options[:expected_attr].split(':')
if expected_attr_name and expected_attr_type and expected_attr_value
if options[:expected_exists] and options[:expected_exists] == 'true' #-a Id:S:001 -e true
opts['Expected'] = { expected_attr_name => { 'Value' => { expected_attr_type => expected_attr_value }, 'Exists' => options[:expected_exists] } }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 88.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if options[:expected_attr] #-e
expected_attr_name, expected_attr_type, expected_attr_value = options[:expected_attr].split(':')
if expected_attr_name and expected_attr_type and expected_attr_value
if options[:expected_exists] and options[:expected_exists] == 'true' #-e Id:S:001 -x true
opts['Expected'] = { expected_attr_name => { 'Value' => { expected_attr_type => expected_attr_value }, 'Exists' => options[:expected_exists] } }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 88.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method multipart_upload
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def multipart_upload(options)
bucket_name, file_path, tmp_loc, acl = options[:bucket_name], options[:file_path], options[:tmp_dir], options[:acl]
dir = @conn.directories.get(bucket_name)
abort "cannot find bucket: #{bucket_name}" unless dir
file = File.expand_path(file_path)
Method batch_write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def batch_write(options)
request_items = {}
#request_items['RequestItems'] = {}
options[:put_requests] and options[:put_requests].each do |request|
#table_name,col_name1:col_type1:col_value1,col_name2:col_type2:col_value2 ..
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get(options)
#get_item(table_name, key, options = {})
opts = {}
key = {}
abort 'Invalid --hash-key format' unless options[:hash_key] =~ /(N|S|NS|SS|B|BS):(.*)/
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(options)
#validate block device mapping and parse it to a hash understandable by fog
opts = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(options))
block_device_mapping = Array.new
if options[:block_device_mappings]
Method create
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(options)
username = options[:user_name]
@conn.create_user(username, options[:path] ||= '/')
puts "Created User: #{username}"
if options[:password]
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(options)
# => validate & parse options
opts = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(options))
#launch conf name
abort "Launch configuration name not found: #{options[:launch_configuration_name]}" unless @conn.configurations.get(options[:launch_configuration_name])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File as.rb
has 252 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Awscli
module As
class Activities
def initialize(connection)
Method delete_rec
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_rec(dir_name)
#Forked from https://gist.github.com/bdunagan/1383301
data_queue = Queue.new
semaphore = Mutex.new
threads = Array.new
Method upload_file_rec
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_file_rec(options)
dir_name, dir_path, threads_count, is_public = options[:bucket_name], options[:dir_path], options[:thread_count], options[:public]
dest_path = options[:dest_path] if options[:dest_path]
#check if bucket exists
bucket = @conn.directories.get(dir_name)
Method update
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update(options)
opts = {}
key = {}
attribute_updates = {}
#Build and validate key
Method batch_write
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def batch_write(options)
request_items = {}
#request_items['RequestItems'] = {}
options[:put_requests] and options[:put_requests].each do |request|
#table_name,col_name1:col_type1:col_value1,col_name2:col_type2:col_value2 ..
Method scan
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scan
unless options[:table_name]
abort 'option --table-name is required.'
end
if options[:scan_filter]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"