Sign upLogin

assemblymade/coderwall

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 189 of 189 total issues

Method perform has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def perform(user_id)
    begin
      user = User.find(user_id)
      return if user.active?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/workers/user_activate_worker.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    const_set "Judge#{year}", Class.new(BadgeBase) {
      describe "KO Judge",
               skill:       'Node.js',
               description: "Official Judge of the #{year} Node Knockout",
               for:         "judging the #{year} Node Knockout.",
Severity: Major
Found in app/badges/node_knockout.rb and 7 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 149..156
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 167..174
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 176..183
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 185..192
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 194..201
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 203..210
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 212..219

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method perform has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def perform(process_type, like_id)
    like = Like.find(like_id)
    case process_type
      when 'associate_to_user'
        begin
Severity: Minor
Found in app/jobs/process_like_job.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method my_protips? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def my_protips?(topics)
    topics.map do |topic|
      if Protip::USER_SCOPE_REGEX[:author] =~ topic || Protip::USER_SCOPE_REGEX[:bookmark] =~ topic
        return true
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/protips_helper.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method update has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def update
    # strong_parameters will intentionally fail if a key is present but has an empty hash. :(
    update_params = if params[:protip] && params[:protip].keys.present?
                      params.require(:protip).permit(:title, :body, :user_id, :topic_list)
                    else
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/protips_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    const_set "MostUseful#{year}", Class.new(BadgeBase) {
      describe "KO Utility",
               skill:       'Node.js',
               description: "Won the most useful app in the #{year} Node Knockout",
               for:         "winning the most useful app in the #{year} Node Knockout",
Severity: Major
Found in app/badges/node_knockout.rb and 7 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 149..156
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 158..165
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 167..174
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 176..183
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 185..192
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 203..210
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 212..219

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method reverse_geocode has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def reverse_geocode(ip_address)
      uri = URI::HTTP.build(scheme: 'http',
                            host: 'geoip.maxmind.com',
                            path: @service_path,
                            query: URI.encode_www_form(l: @license,
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/reverse_geocoder.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    const_set "MostInnovative#{year}", Class.new(BadgeBase) {
      describe "KO Innovation",
               skill:       'Node.js',
               description: "Won the most innovative app in the #{year} Node Knockout",
               for:         "winning the most innovative app in the #{year} Node Knockout",
Severity: Major
Found in app/badges/node_knockout.rb and 7 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 149..156
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 158..165
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 167..174
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 176..183
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 185..192
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 194..201
app/badges/node_knockout.rb on lines 212..219

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method search_next has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def search_next(query, tag, index, page)
      return nil if page.nil? || (tag.blank? && query.blank?) #when your viewing a protip if we don't check this it thinks we came from trending and shows the next trending prootip eventhough we directly landed here
      page = (index.to_i * page.to_i) + 1
      tag = [tag] unless tag.is_a?(Array) || tag.nil?
      search(query, tag, page: page, per_page: 1).results.try(:first)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/protip.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method tag_when_project_matches has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def tag_when_project_matches(tag_name, matcher, readme_matcher, language = nil)
      if language && dominant_language.downcase == language.downcase
        if field_matches?(self.name, matcher) ||
            field_matches?(self.description, matcher) ||
            (readme_matcher && dominant_language_percentage > LANGUAGE_THRESHOLD_FOR_README && readme_matches?(readme_matcher))
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/repository.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function startGui has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function startGui() {
    inputPane = $('.x-tip-content.edit #protip_body')[0];
    previewPane = $('.x-tip-content.preview #body')[0];

    // if (typeof previewPane === "undefined")
Severity: Minor
Found in app/assets/javascripts/showdown-gui.js - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method date has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def date
    date_params = params.permit(:date, :query, :page, :per_page)

    date = Date.current if date_params[:date].downcase == "today"
    date = Date.current.advance(days: -1) if params[:date].downcase == "yesterday"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/protips_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method show has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def show
    show_params = if is_admin?
                    params.permit(:reply_to, :q, :t, :i, :p)
                  else
                    params.permit(:reply_to)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/protips_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method destroy has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def destroy
    self_removal = current_user.id == params[:id]
    return head(:forbidden) unless signed_in? && (@team.admin?(current_user) || self_removal)
    @team.members.find_by_user_id!(params[:id]).destroy
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/members_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  end

  def following_for(github_username, since=Time.at(0))
    (@client.following(github_username, per_page: 100) || []).map do |user|
      user.except *USER_ATTRIBUTES_TO_IGNORE
Severity: Minor
Found in app/structs/github_old.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
app/structs/github_old.rb on lines 56..62
app/structs/github_old.rb on lines 72..78

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  end

  def watched_repos_for(github_username, since=Time.at(0))
    (@client.watched(github_username, per_page: 100) || []).map do |repo|
      repo.except *REPO_ATTRIBUTES_TO_IGNORE
Severity: Minor
Found in app/structs/github_old.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
app/structs/github_old.rb on lines 56..62
app/structs/github_old.rb on lines 64..70

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  end

  def followers_for(github_username, since=Time.at(0))
    (@client.followers(github_username, per_page: 100) || []).map do |user|
      user.except *USER_ATTRIBUTES_TO_IGNORE
Severity: Minor
Found in app/structs/github_old.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
app/structs/github_old.rb on lines 64..70
app/structs/github_old.rb on lines 72..78

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  state_machine initial: :active do
    event :report_spam do
      transition active: :reported_as_spam
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/comment.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
app/models/protip.rb on lines 131..141

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  state_machine initial: :active do
    event :report_spam do
      transition active: :reported_as_spam
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/protip.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
app/models/comment.rb on lines 44..54

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def viewed_by(viewer)
    epoch_now = Time.now.to_i
    Redis.current.incr(impressions_key)
    if viewer.is_a?(User)
      Redis.current.zadd(user_views_key, epoch_now, viewer.id)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/team.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
app/models/opportunity.rb on lines 154..160

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language