Method read_challenge_tx
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.read_challenge_tx(server:, challenge_xdr:, **options)
envelope = Stellar::TransactionEnvelope.from_xdr(challenge_xdr, "base64")
transaction = envelope.tx
if transaction.seq_num != 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_challenge_tx
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.build_challenge_tx(server:, client:, domain: nil, timeout: 300, **options)
if domain.blank? && options.key?(:anchor_name)
ActiveSupport::Deprecation.new("next release", "stellar-sdk").warn <<~MSG
SEP-10 v2.0.0 requires usage of service home domain instead of anchor name in the challenge transaction.
Please update your implementation to use `Stellar::SEP10.build_challenge_tx(..., home_domain: 'example.com')`.
Method read_challenge_tx
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.read_challenge_tx(server:, challenge_xdr:, **options)
envelope = Stellar::TransactionEnvelope.from_xdr(challenge_xdr, "base64")
transaction = envelope.tx
if transaction.seq_num != 0
Method verify_challenge_tx_signers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.verify_challenge_tx_signers(server:, challenge_xdr:, signers:)
raise InvalidSep10ChallengeError, "no signers provided" if signers.empty?
te, _ = read_challenge_tx(server: server, challenge_xdr: challenge_xdr)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_challenge_tx
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.build_challenge_tx(server:, client:, domain: nil, timeout: 300, **options)
if domain.blank? && options.key?(:anchor_name)
ActiveSupport::Deprecation.new("next release", "stellar-sdk").warn <<~MSG
SEP-10 v2.0.0 requires usage of service home domain instead of anchor name in the challenge transaction.
Please update your implementation to use `Stellar::SEP10.build_challenge_tx(..., home_domain: 'example.com')`.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"