Sign upLogin

atpsoft/dohtest

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 20 of 20 total issues

Class StreamOutput has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class StreamOutput
  DEFAULT_COLORS = {:failure => :red, :error => :magenta, :info => :blue, :success => :green}.freeze

  def initialize(std_ios = nil, err_ios = nil)
    @error_count = @groups_ran = @groups_skipped = @tests_ran = @tests_skipped = @assertions_failed = @assertions_passed = 0
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/dohtest/stream_output.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method run_end has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def run_end(duration)
    total_assertions = @assertions_passed + @assertions_failed

    if duration >= 1
      tests_per_second = (@tests_ran / duration).round(2)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/dohtest/stream_output.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method run_end has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def run_end(duration)
    total_assertions = @assertions_passed + @assertions_failed

    if duration >= 1
      tests_per_second = (@tests_ran / duration).round(2)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/dohtest/stream_output.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method assert_raises has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def assert_raises(*expected)
    msg = expected.pop if expected.last.is_a?(String)
    begin
      yield
      no_exception = true
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/dohtest/assertions.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method group_end has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def group_end(group_name, tests_ran, tests_skipped, assertions_passed, assertions_failed)
    @tests_skipped += tests_skipped
    if tests_ran == 0
      if tests_skipped > 0
        @groups_skipped += 1
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/dohtest/stream_output.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method find_relevant_stack has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def find_relevant_stack
    retval = []
    found_start = false
    @backtrace.each do |location|
      has_doh_test = location.index('dohtest')
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/dohtest/backtrace_parser.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method load_configuration_file has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def load_configuration_file(start_path)
  start_path = File.expand_path(start_path || '.')
  if File.directory?(start_path)
    start_directory = start_path
  else
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/dohtest/configure.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method load_configuration_file has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def load_configuration_file(start_path)
  start_path = File.expand_path(start_path || '.')
  if File.directory?(start_path)
    start_directory = start_path
  else
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/dohtest/configure.rb - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method group_end has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def group_end(group_name, tests_ran, tests_skipped, assertions_passed, assertions_failed)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/dohtest/capture_output.rb - About 35 mins to fix

          Method group_end has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def group_end(group_name, tests_ran, tests_skipped, assertions_passed, assertions_failed)
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/dohtest/stream_output.rb - About 35 mins to fix

            Method run_tests has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def run_tests
    determine_test_methods
    find_before_each_method
    find_after_each_method
    setup_brink
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/dohtest/group_runner.rb - About 35 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method run_after_all has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def run_after_all
    @group.after_all if @group.respond_to?(:after_all)
    @config[:post_group_callback].each do |callback|
      if (!callback.call(total_problems))
        @error_count += 1
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/dohtest/group_runner.rb - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method run has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def run
    start_time = Time.now
    srand(@config[:seed])
    @output.run_begin(@config)
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/dohtest/master_runner.rb - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method run_before_each has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def run_before_each
    @config[:pre_each_callback].each do |callback|
      if !callback.call
        @error_count += 1
        @output.callback_failed(callback.inspect)
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/dohtest/group_runner.rb - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method run_before_all has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def run_before_all
    @group.before_all if @group.respond_to?(:before_all)
    @config[:pre_group_callback].each do |callback|
      if (!callback.call(@group))
        @error_count += 1
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/dohtest/group_runner.rb - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method run_after_each has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def run_after_each
    @group.send(@after_each_method) if @after_each_method
    @config[:post_each_callback].each do |callback|
      if !callback.call
        @error_count += 1
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/dohtest/group_runner.rb - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def find_before_each_method
    has_before_each = @group.respond_to?(:before_each)
    has_setup = @group.respond_to?(:setup)
    if has_before_each && has_setup
      raise ":before_each and :setup both defined; please pick one"
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/dohtest/group_runner.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
            lib/dohtest/group_runner.rb on lines 79..90

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 26.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def find_after_each_method
    has_after_each = @group.respond_to?(:after_each)
    has_teardown = @group.respond_to?(:teardown)
    if has_after_each && has_teardown
      raise ":after_each and :teardown both defined; please pick one"
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/dohtest/group_runner.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
            lib/dohtest/group_runner.rb on lines 65..76

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 26.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                if @groups_skipped == 0
      group_str = "#@groups_ran groups"
    else
      total_groups = @groups_ran + @groups_skipped
      group_str = "#{total_groups} groups: #@groups_ran ran, #@groups_skipped skipped"
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/dohtest/stream_output.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
            lib/dohtest/stream_output.rb on lines 54..58

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 25.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                if @tests_skipped == 0
      test_str = "#@tests_ran tests"
    else
      total_tests = @tests_ran + @tests_skipped
      test_str = "#{total_tests} tests: #@tests_ran ran, #@tests_skipped skipped"
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/dohtest/stream_output.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
            lib/dohtest/stream_output.rb on lines 47..51

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 25.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Severity
            Category
            Status
            Source
            Language