Showing 59 of 59 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(function () {
// Turns the Array of operation Objects into an Array of JSON stringifyable objects
var serialiseOps = function (operations) {
return operations.map(function (op) {
return {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1189.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
(function () {
// Turns the Array of operation Objects into an Array of JSON stringifyable objects
var serialiseOps = function (operations) {
return operations.map(function (op) {
return {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1189.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File opentok-editor.js
has 1662 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* /\
* / \ ot 0.0.15
* / \ http://operational-transformation.github.com
* \ /
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var OpenTokAdapter = (function () {
'use strict';
function OpenTokAdapter (session, revision, doc, operations) {
OT.$.eventing(this);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 734.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var OpenTokAdapter = (function () {
'use strict';
function OpenTokAdapter (session, revision, doc, operations) {
OT.$.eventing(this);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 734.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function TextOperation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 207 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ot.TextOperation = (function () {
'use strict';
// Constructor for new operations.
function TextOperation () {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function TextOperation
has 393 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ot.TextOperation = (function () {
'use strict';
// Constructor for new operations.
function TextOperation () {
Function EditorClient
has a Cognitive Complexity of 94 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ot.EditorClient = (function () {
'use strict';
var Client = ot.Client;
var Selection = ot.Selection;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function EditorClient
has 273 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ot.EditorClient = (function () {
'use strict';
var Client = ot.Client;
var Selection = ot.Selection;
Function CodeMirrorAdapter
has 257 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ot.CodeMirrorAdapter = (function (global) {
'use strict';
var TextOperation = ot.TextOperation;
var Selection = ot.Selection;
Function CodeMirrorAdapter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 61 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ot.CodeMirrorAdapter = (function (global) {
'use strict';
var TextOperation = ot.TextOperation;
var Selection = ot.Selection;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Selection
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ot.Selection = (function (global) {
'use strict';
var TextOperation = global.ot ? global.ot.TextOperation : require('./text-operation');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function AjaxAdapter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ot.AjaxAdapter = (function () {
'use strict';
function AjaxAdapter (path, ownUserName, revision) {
if (path[path.length - 1] !== '/') { path += '/'; }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function link
has 103 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
var opentokEditor = element.context.querySelector('div.opentok-editor'),
modeSelect = element.context.querySelector('select'),
myCodeMirror,
cmClient,
Function link
has 103 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
var opentokEditor = element.context.querySelector('div.opentok-editor'),
modeSelect = element.context.querySelector('select'),
myCodeMirror,
cmClient,
Function AjaxAdapter
has 98 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ot.AjaxAdapter = (function () {
'use strict';
function AjaxAdapter (path, ownUserName, revision) {
if (path[path.length - 1] !== '/') { path += '/'; }
Function transform
has 93 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TextOperation.transform = function (operation1, operation2) {
if (operation1.baseLength !== operation2.baseLength) {
throw new Error("Both operations have to have the same base length");
}
Function Client
has 93 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ot.Client = (function (global) {
'use strict';
// Client constructor
function Client (revision) {
Function compose
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TextOperation.prototype.compose = function (operation2) {
var operation1 = this;
if (operation1.targetLength !== operation2.baseLength) {
throw new Error("The base length of the second operation has to be the target length of the first operation");
}
Function UndoManager
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ot.UndoManager = (function () {
'use strict';
var NORMAL_STATE = 'normal';
var UNDOING_STATE = 'undoing';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"