Showing 255 of 255 total issues
Method open_excel
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def open_excel( file_name, options = {})
@excel = DataShift::Excel.new
@excel.open(file_name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method worksheet
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def worksheet( index )
if @workbook
x = index.is_a?(String) ? @workbook.getSheetIndex(index.to_java(java.lang.String)) : index
return @workbook.getSheetAt(x)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write( file_name = nil )
file = file_name.nil? ? @filepath : file_name
out = FileOutputStream.new(file)
@workbook.write(out) unless @workbook.nil?
out.close
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_files
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.get_files(path, options = {})
return [path] if File.file?(path)
glob = options[:glob] ? options[:glob] : '*.*'
glob = options['recursive'] || options[:recursive] ? "**/#{glob}" : glob
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_loader
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.get_loader(file_name)
raise DataShift::BadFile, "Cannot load #{file_name} file not found." unless File.exist?(file_name)
ext = File.extname(file_name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method assignment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def assignment(record, value, model_method)
operator = model_method.operator
connection_adapter_column = model_method.connection_adapter_column
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method poi_cell_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def poi_cell_type(data)
if data.is_a?(Numeric)
HSSFCell::CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC
elsif data.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Block has too many lines. [26/25] Open
TRANSFORMERS_HASH_INSTANCE_NAMES.each do |tname|
plural_tname = tname.to_s.pluralize
# NAME : defaults_for(key)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.
Empty line detected around arguments. Open
Each matching file is used to create an instance of the paperclip attachment, given by :attachment_klass.
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks if empty lines exist around the arguments of a method invocation.
Example:
# bad
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
# good
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
Empty line detected around arguments. Open
Once instance of :attach_to_klass found, the new attachment is assigned.
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks if empty lines exist around the arguments of a method invocation.
Example:
# bad
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
# good
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
Empty line detected around arguments. Open
The attribute to assign new attachment to is gtiven by :attach_to_field
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks if empty lines exist around the arguments of a method invocation.
Example:
# bad
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
# good
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
Use meaningful heredoc delimiters. Open
EOS
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that your heredocs are using meaningful delimiters.
By default it disallows END
and EO*
, and can be configured through
blacklisting additional delimiters.
Example:
# good
<<-SQL
SELECT * FROM foo
SQL
# bad
<<-END
SELECT * FROM foo
END
# bad
<<-EOS
SELECT * FROM foo
EOS
Use meaningful heredoc delimiters. Open
EOS
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that your heredocs are using meaningful delimiters.
By default it disallows END
and EO*
, and can be configured through
blacklisting additional delimiters.
Example:
# good
<<-SQL
SELECT * FROM foo
SQL
# bad
<<-END
SELECT * FROM foo
END
# bad
<<-EOS
SELECT * FROM foo
EOS
Use meaningful heredoc delimiters. Open
EOS
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that your heredocs are using meaningful delimiters.
By default it disallows END
and EO*
, and can be configured through
blacklisting additional delimiters.
Example:
# good
<<-SQL
SELECT * FROM foo
SQL
# bad
<<-END
SELECT * FROM foo
END
# bad
<<-EOS
SELECT * FROM foo
EOS
Dependencies should be sorted in an alphabetical order within their section of the gemspec. Dependency paperclip
should appear before thor
. Open
s.add_runtime_dependency 'paperclip', '>= 4.3', '<= 6.0.0'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Dependencies in the gemspec should be alphabetically sorted.
Example:
# bad
spec.add_dependency 'rubocop'
spec.add_dependency 'rspec'
# good
spec.add_dependency 'rspec'
spec.add_dependency 'rubocop'
# good
spec.add_dependency 'rubocop'
spec.add_dependency 'rspec'
# bad
spec.add_development_dependency 'rubocop'
spec.add_development_dependency 'rspec'
# good
spec.add_development_dependency 'rspec'
spec.add_development_dependency 'rubocop'
# good
spec.add_development_dependency 'rubocop'
spec.add_development_dependency 'rspec'
# bad
spec.add_runtime_dependency 'rubocop'
spec.add_runtime_dependency 'rspec'
# good
spec.add_runtime_dependency 'rspec'
spec.add_runtime_dependency 'rubocop'
# good
spec.add_runtime_dependency 'rubocop'
spec.add_runtime_dependency 'rspec'
# good only if TreatCommentsAsGroupSeparators is true
# For code quality
spec.add_dependency 'rubocop'
# For tests
spec.add_dependency 'rspec'
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
s.add_dependency "rubyzip", ">= 1.3.0"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Use a guard clause instead of wrapping the code inside a conditional expression. Open
if File.exist?(env)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use a guard clause instead of wrapping the code inside a conditional expression
Example:
# bad
def test
if something
work
end
end
# good
def test
return unless something
work
end
# also good
def test
work if something
end
# bad
if something
raise 'exception'
else
ok
end
# good
raise 'exception' if something
ok
Use a guard clause instead of wrapping the code inside a conditional expression. Open
if File.exist?(File.expand_path('config/environment.rb'))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use a guard clause instead of wrapping the code inside a conditional expression
Example:
# bad
def test
if something
work
end
end
# good
def test
return unless something
work
end
# also good
def test
work if something
end
# bad
if something
raise 'exception'
else
ok
end
# good
raise 'exception' if something
ok
Empty line detected around arguments. Open
The class with the relationship, can be specified via :attach_to_klass
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks if empty lines exist around the arguments of a method invocation.
Example:
# bad
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
# good
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
s.add_dependency "rubyzip", ">= 1.3.0"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"