Assignment Branch Condition size for format is too high. [40.91/15] Open
def format
vars = variables.map do |var|
property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
accessor = if struct.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
struct.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [33/10] Open
def format
vars = variables.map do |var|
property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
accessor = if struct.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
struct.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method format
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format
vars = variables.map do |var|
property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
accessor = if struct.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
struct.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Perceived complexity for format is too high. [12/7] Open
def format
vars = variables.map do |var|
property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
accessor = if struct.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
struct.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Cyclomatic complexity for format is too high. [8/6] Open
def format
vars = variables.map do |var|
property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
accessor = if struct.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
struct.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Method format
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format
vars = variables.map do |var|
property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
accessor = if struct.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
struct.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
key = left_aligned do
align(declaration, declaration.size)
end
unless options[:plain]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if options[:multiline]
"#<#{awesome_instance}\n#{data.join(%Q/,\n/)}\n#{outdent}>"
else
"#<#{awesome_instance} #{data.join(', ')}>"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Line is too long. [81/80] Open
"#{struct.class.superclass}:#{struct.class}:0x%08x" % (struct.__id__ * 2)
- Exclude checks
Line is too long. [98/80] Open
property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
- Exclude checks
Use %
instead of %Q
. Open
"#<#{awesome_instance}\n#{data.join(%Q/,\n/)}\n#{outdent}>"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if usage of %() or %Q() matches configuration.
Example: EnforcedStyle: bare_percent (default)
# bad
%Q(He said: "#{greeting}")
%q{She said: 'Hi'}
# good
%(He said: "#{greeting}")
%{She said: 'Hi'}
Example: EnforcedStyle: percent_q
# bad
%|He said: "#{greeting}"|
%/She said: 'Hi'/
# good
%Q|He said: "#{greeting}"|
%q/She said: 'Hi'/
Favor format
over String#%
. Open
"#{struct.class.superclass}:#{struct.class}:0x%08x" % (struct.__id__ * 2)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop enforces the use of a single string formatting utility. Valid options include Kernel#format, Kernel#sprintf and String#%.
The detection of String#% cannot be implemented in a reliable manner for all cases, so only two scenarios are considered - if the first argument is a string literal and if the second argument is an array literal.
Example: EnforcedStyle: format(default)
# bad
puts sprintf('%10s', 'hoge')
puts '%10s' % 'hoge'
# good
puts format('%10s', 'hoge')
Example: EnforcedStyle: sprintf
# bad
puts format('%10s', 'hoge')
puts '%10s' % 'hoge'
# good
puts sprintf('%10s', 'hoge')
Example: EnforcedStyle: percent
# bad
puts format('%10s', 'hoge')
puts sprintf('%10s', 'hoge')
# good
puts '%10s' % 'hoge'
end
at 23, 10 is not aligned with if
at 19, 21. Open
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks whether the end keywords are aligned properly.
Three modes are supported through the EnforcedStyleAlignWith
configuration parameter:
If it's set to keyword
(which is the default), the end
shall be aligned with the start of the keyword (if, class, etc.).
If it's set to variable
the end
shall be aligned with the
left-hand-side of the variable assignment, if there is one.
If it's set to start_of_line
, the end
shall be aligned with the
start of the line where the matching keyword appears.
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: keyword (default)
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: variable
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: startofline
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
puts(if true
end)
Avoid the use of Perl-style backrefs. Open
key.sub!($1, colorize($1, :variable))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop looks for uses of Perl-style regexp match backreferences like $1, $2, etc.
Example:
# bad
puts $1
# good
puts Regexp.last_match(1)
Missing top-level class documentation comment. Open
class StructFormatter < BaseFormatter
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for missing top-level documentation of classes and modules. Classes with no body are exempt from the check and so are namespace modules - modules that have nothing in their bodies except classes, other modules, or constant definitions.
The documentation requirement is annulled if the class or module has a "#:nodoc:" comment next to it. Likewise, "#:nodoc: all" does the same for all its children.
Example:
# bad
class Person
# ...
end
# good
# Description/Explanation of Person class
class Person
# ...
end
Extra empty line detected at class body beginning. Open
attr_reader :struct, :variables, :inspector, :options
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks if empty lines around the bodies of classes match the configuration.
Example: EnforcedStyle: empty_lines
# good
class Foo
def bar
# ...
end
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: emptylinesexcept_namespace
# good
class Foo
class Bar
# ...
end
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: emptylinesspecial
# good
class Foo
def bar; end
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: noemptylines (default)
# good
class Foo
def bar
# ...
end
end
Line is too long. [105/80] Open
key.sub!(/(attr_\w+)\s(\:\w+)/, "#{colorize('\\1', :keyword)} #{colorize('\\2', :method)}")
- Exclude checks
%Q
-literals should be delimited by (
and )
. Open
"#<#{awesome_instance}\n#{data.join(%Q/,\n/)}\n#{outdent}>"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop enforces the consistent usage of %
-literal delimiters.
Specify the 'default' key to set all preferred delimiters at once. You can continue to specify individual preferred delimiters to override the default.
Example:
# Style/PercentLiteralDelimiters:
# PreferredDelimiters:
# default: '[]'
# '%i': '()'
# good
%w[alpha beta] + %i(gamma delta)
# bad
%W(alpha #{beta})
# bad
%I(alpha beta)
Avoid the use of Perl-style backrefs. Open
key.sub!($1, colorize($1, :variable))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop looks for uses of Perl-style regexp match backreferences like $1, $2, etc.
Example:
# bad
puts $1
# good
puts Regexp.last_match(1)
Align else
with if
. Open
else
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks the alignment of else keywords. Normally they should be aligned with an if/unless/while/until/begin/def keyword, but there are special cases when they should follow the same rules as the alignment of end.
Example:
# bad
if something
code
else
code
end
# bad
if something
code
elsif something
code
end
# good
if something
code
else
code
end
Use %Q
only for strings that contain both single quotes and double quotes, or for dynamic strings that contain double quotes. Open
"#<#{awesome_instance}\n#{data.join(%Q/,\n/)}\n#{outdent}>"
- Exclude checks
Use 2 (not -9) spaces for indentation. Open
struct.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks for indentation that doesn't use the specified number of spaces.
See also the IndentationConsistency cop which is the companion to this one.
Example:
# bad
class A
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
# good
class A
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
Example: IgnoredPatterns: ['^\s*module']
# bad
module A
class B
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
end
# good
module A
class B
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
end