Showing 135 of 135 total issues
File jquery.js
has 6344 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery JavaScript Library v1.8.0pre
* http://jquery.com/
*
* Copyright (c) 2012 jQuery Foundation and other contributors
Function ajax
has 240 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( url, options ) {
// If url is an object, simulate pre-1.5 signature
if ( typeof url === "object" ) {
options = url;
Function support
has 143 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.support = (function() {
var support,
all,
a,
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( event.pageX == null && original.clientX != null ) {
eventDoc = event.target.ownerDocument || document;
doc = eventDoc.documentElement;
body = eventDoc.body;
Function Callbacks
has 124 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.Callbacks = function( options ) {
// Convert options from String-formatted to Object-formatted if needed
// (we check in cache first)
options = typeof options === "string" ?
Function trigger
has 93 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
trigger: function( event, data, elem, onlyHandlers ) {
// Don't do events on text and comment nodes
if ( elem && (elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8) ) {
return;
}
Function send
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send: function( headers, complete ) {
// Get a new xhr
var handle, i,
xhr = s.xhr();
Function defaultPrefilter
has 88 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function defaultPrefilter( elem, props, opts ) {
var index, prop, value, length, dataShow, tween, hooks, oldfire,
anim = this,
style = elem.style,
orig = {},
Function clean
has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clean: function( elems, context, fragment, scripts ) {
var j, safe, elem, tag, wrap, depth, div, hasBody, tbody, len, handleScript, jsTags,
i = 0,
ret = [];
Function Animation
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Animation( elem, properties, options ) {
var result,
index = 0,
tweenerIndex = 0,
length = animationPrefilters.length,
Function add
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data, selector ) {
var elemData, eventHandle, events,
t, tns, type, namespaces, handleObj,
handleObjIn, handlers, special;
Function done
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function done( status, nativeStatusText, responses, headers ) {
var isSuccess, success, error, response, modified,
statusText = nativeStatusText;
// Called once
Function dispatch
has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dispatch: function( event ) {
// Make a writable jQuery.Event from the native event object
event = jQuery.event.fix( event || window.event );
Function domManip
has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
domManip: function( args, table, callback ) {
// Flatten any nested arrays
args = [].concat.apply( [], args );
Function Deferred
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Deferred: function( func ) {
var tuples = [
// action, add listener, listener list, final state
[ "resolve", "done", jQuery.Callbacks("once memory"), "resolved" ],
[ "reject", "fail", jQuery.Callbacks("once memory"), "rejected" ],
Function handlePOS
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function handlePOS( selector, context, results, seed, groups ) {
var match, not, anchor, ret, elements, currentContexts, part, lastIndex,
i = 0,
len = groups.length,
rpos = matchExpr["POS"],
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"odd": function( elements, argument, not ) {
var results = [],
i = not ? 0 : 1,
len = elements.length;
for ( ; i < len; i = i + 2 ) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"even": function( elements, argument, not ) {
var results = [],
i = not ? 1 : 0,
len = elements.length;
for ( ; i < len; i = i + 2 ) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function select
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var select = function( selector, context, results, seed, xml ) {
// Remove excessive whitespace
selector = selector.replace( rtrim, "$1" );
var elements, matcher, i, len, elem, token,
type, findContext, notTokens,
Function CHILD
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"CHILD": function( type, argument, first, last ) {
if ( type === "nth" ) {
var doneName = done++;