Sign upLogin

bachya/pyairvisual

View on GitHub
Star
pyairvisual/node.py

Summary

Maintainability
B
6 hrs
Test Coverage

File node.py has 388 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

"""Define objects to interact with an AirVisual Node/Pro."""

from __future__ import annotations

import asyncio
Severity: Minor
Found in pyairvisual/node.py - About 5 hrs to fix

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function _calculate_trends. (10)
Wontfix

def _calculate_trends(
    history: list[OrderedDict], measurements_to_use: int
) -> dict[str, Any]:
    """Calculate the trends of all data points in history data.
Severity: Minor
Found in pyairvisual/node.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _execute_samba_operation. (6)
Wontfix

    async def _execute_samba_operation(
        self,
        pysmb_func: Callable[..., _SambaOperationReturnType],
        *args: Any,
        **kwargs: Any,
Severity: Minor
Found in pyairvisual/node.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function _calculate_trends has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def _calculate_trends(
    history: list[OrderedDict], measurements_to_use: int
) -> dict[str, Any]:
    """Calculate the trends of all data points in history data.
Severity: Minor
Found in pyairvisual/node.py - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status