Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

TooManyPublicMethods

Since: 0.1

A class with too many public methods is probably a good suspect for refactoring, in order to reduce its complexity and find a way to have more fine grained objects.

By default it ignores methods starting with 'get' or 'set'.

Example

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#toomanypublicmethods

TooManyFields

Since: 0.1

Classes that have too many fields could be redesigned to have fewer fields, possibly through some nested object grouping of some of the information. For example, a class with city/state/zip fields could instead have one Address field.

Example

class Person {
   protected $one;
   private $two;
   private $three;
   [... many more fields ...]
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#toomanyfields

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

• Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
• Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
• Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

• Cognitive Complexity docs
• Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability

NPathComplexity

Since: 0.1

The NPath complexity of a method is the number of acyclic execution paths through that method. A threshold of 200 is generally considered the point where measures should be taken to reduce complexity.

Example

class Foo {
    function bar() {
        // lots of complicated code
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#npathcomplexity

CyclomaticComplexity

Since: 0.1

Complexity is determined by the number of decision points in a method plus one for the method entry. The decision points are 'if', 'while', 'for', and 'case labels'. Generally, 1-4 is low complexity, 5-7 indicates moderate complexity, 8-10 is high complexity, and 11+ is very high complexity.

Example

// Cyclomatic Complexity = 11
class Foo {
1   public function example() {
2       if ($a == $b) {
3           if ($a1 == $b1) {
                fiddle();
4           } elseif ($a2 == $b2) {
                fiddle();
            } else {
                fiddle();
            }
5       } elseif ($c == $d) {
6           while ($c == $d) {
                fiddle();
            }
7        } elseif ($e == $f) {
8           for ($n = 0; $n < $h; $n++) {
                fiddle();
            }
        } else {
            switch ($z) {
9               case 1:
                    fiddle();
                    break;
10              case 2:
                    fiddle();
                    break;
11              case 3:
                    fiddle();
                    break;
                default:
                    fiddle();
                    break;
            }
        }
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#cyclomaticcomplexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

See

• Cognitive Complexity

A class that grows too much tends to aggregate too many responsibilities and inevitably becomes harder to understand and therefore to maintain. Above a specific threshold, it is strongly advised to refactor the class into smaller ones which focus on well defined topics.

CouplingBetweenObjects

Since: 1.1.0

A class with too many dependencies has negative impacts on several quality aspects of a class. This includes quality criteria like stability, maintainability and understandability

Example

class Foo {
    /**
     * @var \foo\bar\X
     */
    private $x = null;

    /**
     * @var \foo\bar\Y
     */
    private $y = null;

    /**
     * @var \foo\bar\Z
     */
    private $z = null;

    public function setFoo(\Foo $foo) {}
    public function setBar(\Bar $bar) {}
    public function setBaz(\Baz $baz) {}

    /**
     * @return \SplObjectStorage
     * @throws \OutOfRangeException
     * @throws \InvalidArgumentException
     * @throws \ErrorException
     */
    public function process(\Iterator $it) {}

    // ...
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/design.html#couplingbetweenobjects

BooleanArgumentFlag

Since: 1.4.0

A boolean flag argument is a reliable indicator for a violation of the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). You can fix this problem by extracting the logic in the boolean flag into its own class or method.

Example

class Foo {
    public function bar($flag = true) {
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#booleanargumentflag

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

Merging collapsible if statements increases the code's readability.

Noncompliant Code Example

if (condition1) {
  if (condition2) {
    ...
  }
}

Compliant Solution

if (condition1 && condition2) {
  ...
}

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

function run() {
  prepare('action1');                              // Non-Compliant - 'action1' is duplicated 3 times
  execute('action1');
  release('action1');
}

Compliant Solution

ACTION_1 = 'action1';

function run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Merging collapsible if statements increases the code's readability.

Noncompliant Code Example

if (condition1) {
  if (condition2) {
    ...
  }
}

Compliant Solution

if (condition1 && condition2) {
  ...
}

Merging collapsible if statements increases the code's readability.

Noncompliant Code Example

if (condition1) {
  if (condition2) {
    ...
  }
}

Compliant Solution

if (condition1 && condition2) {
  ...
}

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

function run() {
  prepare('action1');                              // Non-Compliant - 'action1' is duplicated 3 times
  execute('action1');
  release('action1');
}

Compliant Solution

ACTION_1 = 'action1';

function run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source

CamelCaseVariableName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name variables.

Example

class ClassName {
    public function doSomething() {
        $data_module = new DataModule();
    }
}

Source