bblimke/webmock

View on GitHub

Showing 71 of 71 total issues

Method to_s has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def to_s
      if requested_signatures.hash.empty?
        "No requests were made."
      else
        text = "".dup
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webmock/request_registry.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method add_query_params has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def add_query_params(query_params)
      @query_params = if query_params.is_a?(Hash)
        query_params
      elsif query_params.is_a?(WebMock::Matchers::HashIncludingMatcher) \
              || query_params.is_a?(WebMock::Matchers::HashExcludingMatcher)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webmock/request_pattern.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method request_signature_from_request has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.request_signature_from_request(net_http, request, body = nil)
      path = request.path

      if path.respond_to?(:request_uri) #https://github.com/bblimke/webmock/issues/288
        path = path.request_uri
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webmock/http_lib_adapters/net_http.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_request_signature has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def build_request_signature(req, reuse_existing = false)
      uri = WebMock::Util::URI.heuristic_parse(req.header.request_uri.to_s)
      uri.query = WebMock::Util::QueryMapper.values_to_query(req.header.request_query, notation: WebMock::Config.instance.query_values_notation) if req.header.request_query
      uri.port = req.header.request_uri.port

Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webmock/http_lib_adapters/httpclient_adapter.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method handle_file_name has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def self.handle_file_name(req, webmock_response)
          if req.action == :get && req.file_name
            begin
              File.open(req.file_name, "w") do |f|
                f.write webmock_response.body
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webmock/http_lib_adapters/patron_adapter.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          value.each_with_index do |val, i|
            new_parent = options[:notation] != :flat_array ? "#{parent}[#{i}]" : parent
            buffer << "#{to_query(new_parent, val, options)}&"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webmock/util/query_mapper.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/webmock/util/query_mapper.rb on lines 257..259

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          value.each do |key, val|
            new_parent = options[:notation] != :flat_array ? "#{parent}[#{key}]" : parent
            buffer << "#{to_query(new_parent, val, options)}&"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webmock/util/query_mapper.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/webmock/util/query_mapper.rb on lines 264..266

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.enable!(options = {})
    except = [options[:except]].flatten.compact
    HttpLibAdapterRegistry.instance.each_adapter do |name, adapter|
      adapter.disable!
      adapter.enable! unless except.include?(name)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webmock/webmock.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/webmock/webmock.rb on lines 28..32

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.disable!(options = {})
    except = [options[:except]].flatten.compact
    HttpLibAdapterRegistry.instance.each_adapter do |name, adapter|
      adapter.enable!
      adapter.disable! unless except.include?(name)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webmock/webmock.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/webmock/webmock.rb on lines 36..40

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def self.disable!
          Object.send(:remove_const, :HTTPClient)
          Object.send(:const_set, :HTTPClient, OriginalHttpClient)
          if defined? ::JSONClient
            Object.send(:remove_const, :JSONClient)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webmock/http_lib_adapters/httpclient_adapter.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/webmock/http_lib_adapters/httpclient_adapter.rb on lines 24..29

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def self.enable!
          Object.send(:remove_const, :HTTPClient)
          Object.send(:const_set, :HTTPClient, WebMockHTTPClient)
          if defined? ::JSONClient
            Object.send(:remove_const, :JSONClient)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webmock/http_lib_adapters/httpclient_adapter.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/webmock/http_lib_adapters/httpclient_adapter.rb on lines 33..38

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language