Showing 121 of 121 total issues
Method to_latex_code
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_latex_code
if get_setting(:latex_use_listings)
@doc.latex_require_package('listings')
s = "\\lstset{columns=fixed,frame=shadowbox}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method read_inline_html
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_inline_html(src, con)
h = HTMLHelper.new
begin
# This is our current buffer in the context
next_stuff = src.current_remaining_buffer
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method read_simple
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_simple(src, escaped, exit_on_chars=nil, exit_on_strings=nil, warn=true)
Method read_indented_content
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_indented_content(src, indentation, break_list, item_type, ial_offset=0)
Method md_ref_def
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def md_ref_def(ref_id, url, title=nil, meta={}, al=nil)
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
follows = src.cur_chars(4)
if follows =~ /^\_\_\_[^\s\_]/
con.push_element read_emstrong(src, '___')
elsif follows =~ /^\_\_[^\s\_]/
con.push_element read_strong(src, '__')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
follows = src.cur_chars(4)
if follows =~ /^\*\*\*[^\s\*]/
con.push_element read_emstrong(src, '***')
elsif follows =~ /^\*\*[^\s\*]/
con.push_element read_strong(src, '**')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method span_descendents
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def span_descendents(e)
descendents = []
e.each_element do |c|
name = c.respond_to?(:name) ? c.name : nil
if name && HTML_INLINE_ELEMS.include?(c.name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method close_script_style
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def close_script_style
tag = @tag_stack.last
# See http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#C_4 for character sequences not allowed within an element body.
if @already =~ /<|&|\]\]>|--/
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_html_equation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_html_equation
mathml = get_setting(:html_math_output_mathml) && render_mathml(:equation, self.math)
png = get_setting(:html_math_output_png) && render_png(:equation, self.math)
div = xelem('div')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convert_to_mathml_blahtex
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convert_to_mathml_blahtex(kind, tex)
result = run_blahtex(tex, %w[--mathml])
doc = REXML::Document.new(result)
mathml = doc.get_elements('//markup').to_a.first
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extract_chunks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_chunks(is, start_reg, end_reg)
all = []
current = nil; current_start = nil
line = 1
is.each_line do |l|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :olist if self =~ /\A[ ]{0,3}\d+\.\s+.*/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :raw_html if self =~ %r{\A[ ]{0,3}</?\s*\w+}
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :code if number_of_leading_spaces >= 4
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :quote if self =~ /\A>/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :text if self =~ /\A[ ]{0,3}#{EMailAddress}/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :ulist if self =~ /\A[ ]{0,3}([\*\-\+])\s+.*/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :hrule if self =~ /\A(\s*[\*\-_]\s*){3,}\z/
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :raw_html if self =~ /\A[ ]{0,3}<\!\-\-/