Sign upLogin

blambeau/qrb

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 29 of 29 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Syntax
    module RelationType
      include Node

      capture :heading
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/finitio/syntax/type/relation_type.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/finitio/syntax/type/tuple_type.rb on lines 2..20

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module Syntax
    module TupleType
      include Node

      capture :heading
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/finitio/syntax/type/tuple_type.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/finitio/syntax/type/relation_type.rb on lines 2..20

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method name has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def name(name)
      unless name.nil? or (name.is_a?(String) and name.strip.size > 1)
        fail!("Wrong type name `#{name}`")
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/finitio/support/type_factory.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method suppremum has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def suppremum(other)
      return super unless other.is_a?(CollectionType)
      return self if other.is_a?(CollectionType) && elm_type == other.elm_type
      builder = self.class == other.class ? self.class : SeqType
      builder.new(elm_type.suppremum(other.elm_type))
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/finitio/type/collection_type.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method dress has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def dress(value, handler = DressHelper.new)
      # Check that the supertype is able to dress the value.
      # Rewrite and set cause to any encountered TypeError.
      uped = handler.try(self, value) do
        super_type.dress(value, handler)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/finitio/type/sub_type.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method to_json_schema has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def to_json_schema(*args, &bl)
      base = {
        type: "object"
      }
      unless heading.empty?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/finitio/json_schema/hash_based_type.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method fetch_on_imports has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def fetch_on_imports(name, imports = @imports, &bl)
      if imports.empty?
        raise KeyError, %Q{key not found: "#{name}"} unless bl
        bl.call(name)
      else
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/finitio/system.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def initialize(name, metadata)
      unless name.nil? or name.is_a?(String)
        raise ArgumentError, "String expected for type name, got `#{name}`"
      end
      unless metadata.nil? or metadata.is_a?(Hash)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/finitio/type.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def initialize(ruby_type, contracts, name = nil, metadata = nil)
      unless ruby_type.nil? or ruby_type.is_a?(Module)
        raise ArgumentError, "Module expected, got `#{ruby_type}`"
      end
      unless contracts.is_a?(Array) &&
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/finitio/type/ad_type.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language