Showing 7 of 7 total issues
Method diff!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.diff! selector, table, session: Capybara.current_session, &block
root = begin
if selector.is_a?(Capybara::Node::Element)
selector
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method diff!
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.diff! selector, table, session: Capybara.current_session, &block
root = begin
if selector.is_a?(Capybara::Node::Element)
selector
else
Method initialize
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize selector = nil, table = nil, session = Capybara.current_session, timeout = Capybara.default_max_wait_time, block = nil, &other_block
Method hash_transformation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def hash_transformation &block
transformation do |rows|
header = rows[0]
keys = header.to_a.map.with_index do |cell, index|
key = cell.text.parameterize.underscore
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def file *keys
options = extract_options!(keys)
path = options.fetch(:path, "features/support/fixtures")
upload = options.fetch(:upload, false)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method header
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def header index=nil, &block
if index
header_transformation do |row|
if index.is_a?(Symbol)
index = row.index do |cell|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method diff!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def diff! other_table="table", **kwargs, &block
if other_table.respond_to?(:tag_name) || (other_table.is_a?(String) && !other_table.include?("|"))
DSL.diff! other_table, self, **kwargs, &block
else
super
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"