Showing 83 of 83 total issues
Function _on_s02f35
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _on_s02f35(self, # noqa: C901, pylint: disable=too-many-branches
handler: secsgem.secs.SecsHandler,
message: secsgem.common.Message) -> secsgem.secs.SecsStreamFunction | None:
"""Handle Stream 2, Function 35, Link event report.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _on_s02f33
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _on_s02f33(self, # noqa: C901, pylint: disable=too-many-branches
handler: secsgem.secs.SecsHandler,
message: secsgem.common.Message) -> secsgem.secs.SecsStreamFunction | None:
"""Handle Stream 2, Function 33, Define Report.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File protocol.py
has 362 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
#####################################################################
# protocol.py
#
# (c) Copyright 2013-2023, Benjamin Parzella. All rights reserved.
#
HsmsProtocol
has 31 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class HsmsProtocol(secsgem.common.Protocol[HsmsMessage, HsmsBlock]): # pylint: disable=too-many-instance-attributes
"""Baseclass for creating Host/Equipment models.
This layer contains the HSMS functionality.
Inherit from this class and override required functions.
SecsHandler
has 28 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class SecsHandler: # pylint: disable=too-many-instance-attributes,too-many-public-methods
"""Baseclass for creating Host/Equipment models. This layer contains the SECS functionality.
Inherit from this class and override required functions.
"""
Function
has 27 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Function: # pylint: disable=too-many-instance-attributes
"""Function configuration from yaml."""
sf_regex = re.compile(r"[sS](\d+)[fF](\d+)")
Protocol
has 26 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Protocol(abc.ABC, typing.Generic[MessageT, BlockT]): # pylint: disable=too-many-instance-attributes
"""Abstract base class for a protocol."""
message_type: type[MessageT]
Function _on_s02f29
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _on_s02f29(self,
handler: secsgem.secs.SecsHandler,
message: secsgem.common.Message) -> secsgem.secs.SecsStreamFunction | None:
"""Handle Stream 2, Function 29, EC namelist request.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File __init__.py
has 275 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
#####################################################################
# __init__.py
#
# (c) Copyright 2013-2023, Benjamin Parzella. All rights reserved.
#
File _all.py
has 271 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
#####################################################################
# _all.py
#
# (c) Copyright 2023, Benjamin Parzella. All rights reserved.
#
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _on_s02f33. (15) Open
def _on_s02f33(self, # noqa: C901, pylint: disable=too-many-branches
handler: secsgem.secs.SecsHandler,
message: secsgem.common.Message) -> secsgem.secs.SecsStreamFunction | None:
"""Handle Stream 2, Function 33, Define Report.
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
File function.py
has 266 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"""Function class definition."""
import collections
import re
import typing
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _on_s02f35. (13) Open
def _on_s02f35(self, # noqa: C901, pylint: disable=too-many-branches
handler: secsgem.secs.SecsHandler,
message: secsgem.common.Message) -> secsgem.secs.SecsStreamFunction | None:
"""Handle Stream 2, Function 35, Link event report.
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
DataItem
has 21 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class DataItem:
"""Data item configuration from yaml."""
def __init__(self, name, data) -> None:
"""Initialize item config."""
Function get_format
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_format(data_format, showname=False):
"""Get the format of the variable.
:returns: returns the string representation of the function
:rtype: string
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File __init__.py
has 253 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
#####################################################################
# __init__.py
#
# (c) Copyright 2013-2023, Benjamin Parzella. All rights reserved.
#
Function __receiver_thread_read_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __receiver_thread_read_data(self):
# check if shutdown requested
while not self._stop_thread:
# check if data available
select_result = select.select([self._socket], [], [self._socket], self.select_timeout)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _on_s02f15
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _on_s02f15(self,
handler: secsgem.secs.SecsHandler,
message: secsgem.common.Message) -> secsgem.secs.SecsStreamFunction | None:
"""Handle Stream 2, Function 15, Equipment constant send.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __repr__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __repr__(self):
"""Generate textual representation for an object of this class."""
if len(self.value) == 0:
return f"<{self.text_code}>"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function set
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set(self, value):
"""Set the internal value to the provided value.
:param value: new value
:type value: list/boolean
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"