Sign upLogin

brynary/webrat

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 35 of 35 total issues

Method normalize_url has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def normalize_url(href) #:nodoc:
      uri = URI.parse(href)
      normalized_url = []
      normalized_url << "#{uri.scheme}://" if uri.scheme
      normalized_url << uri.host if uri.host
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/adapters/rails.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def absolute_href
      if href =~ /^\?/
        "#{@session.current_url}#{href}"
      elsif href !~ %r{^https?://[\w|.]+(/.*)} && (href !~ /^\//)
        "#{@session.current_url}/#{href}"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/core/elements/area.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/webrat/core/elements/link.rb on lines 44..51

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method select_time has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def select_time(time_to_select, options ={})
      time = time_to_select.is_a?(Time) ? time_to_select : Time.parse(time_to_select)

      id_prefix = locate_id_prefix(options) do
        hour_field = FieldByIdLocator.new(@session, dom, /(.*?)_#{DATE_TIME_SUFFIXES[:hour]}$/).locate
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/core/scope.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method click has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def click(options = {})
      method = options[:method] || http_method
      return if href =~ /^#/ && method == :get

      options[:javascript] = true if options[:javascript].nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/core/elements/link.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method unescape_params has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.unescape_params(params)
      case params.class.name
      when 'Hash', 'Mash'
        params.each { |key,value| params[key] = unescape_params(value) }
        params
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/core/elements/form.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def absolute_href
      if href =~ /^\?/
        "#{@session.current_url}#{href}"
      elsif href !~ %r{^https?://} && (href !~ /^\//)
        "#{@session.current_url}/#{href}"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/core/elements/link.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/webrat/core/elements/area.rb on lines 20..27

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method matches_id? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def matches_id?(link)
        if @value.is_a?(Regexp)
          link["id"] =~ @value ? true : false
        else
          link["id"] == @value ? true : false
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/core/locators/link_locator.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method field_class has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.field_class(element)
      case element.name
      when "button"   then ButtonField
      when "select"
        if element.attributes["multiple"].nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/core/elements/field.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method link_element has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def link_element
        matching_links.min { |a, b|
          a_score = a.inner_text =~ matcher ? a.inner_text.length : 100
          b_score = b.inner_text =~ matcher ? b.inner_text.length : 100
          a_score <=> b_score
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/core/locators/link_locator.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method locate_id_prefix has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def locate_id_prefix(options, &location_strategy) #:nodoc:
      return options[:id_prefix] if options[:id_prefix]

      if options[:from]
        if (label = LabelLocator.new(@session, dom, options[:from]).locate)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/core/scope.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      id_prefix = locate_id_prefix(options) do
        year_field = FieldByIdLocator.new(@session, dom, /(.*?)_#{DATE_TIME_SUFFIXES[:year]}$/).locate
        raise NotFoundError.new("No date fields were found") unless year_field && year_field.id =~ /(.*?)_1i/
        $1
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/core/scope.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/webrat/core/scope.rb on lines 192..195

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      id_prefix = locate_id_prefix(options) do
        hour_field = FieldByIdLocator.new(@session, dom, /(.*?)_#{DATE_TIME_SUFFIXES[:hour]}$/).locate
        raise NotFoundError.new("No time fields were found") unless hour_field && hour_field.id =~ /(.*?)_4i/
        $1
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/core/scope.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/webrat/core/scope.rb on lines 158..161

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def fail
          $stderr.puts
          $stderr.puts
          $stderr.puts "==> Failed to boot the application server... exiting!"
          $stderr.puts
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/selenium/application_servers/rack.rb and 2 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
lib/webrat/selenium/application_servers/merb.rb on lines 20..28
lib/webrat/selenium/application_servers/rails.rb on lines 18..26

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def fail
          $stderr.puts
          $stderr.puts
          $stderr.puts "==> Failed to boot the Merb application server... exiting!"
          $stderr.puts
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/selenium/application_servers/merb.rb and 2 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
lib/webrat/selenium/application_servers/rack.rb on lines 22..30
lib/webrat/selenium/application_servers/rails.rb on lines 18..26

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        def fail
          $stderr.puts
          $stderr.puts
          $stderr.puts "==> Failed to boot the Rails application server... exiting!"
          $stderr.puts
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/webrat/selenium/application_servers/rails.rb and 2 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
lib/webrat/selenium/application_servers/merb.rb on lines 20..28
lib/webrat/selenium/application_servers/rack.rb on lines 22..30

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language