bstopp/puppet-aem

View on GitHub
lib/puppet/provider/aem_sling_resource/ruby.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Method submit has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def submit
    uri = URI(content_uri)

    begin
      retries ||= @resource[:retries]
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/puppet/provider/aem_sling_resource/ruby.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method current_content has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def current_content
    depth = get_depth(resource[:properties])

    uri = URI("#{content_uri}.#{depth}.json")
    http = Net::HTTP.new(uri.host, uri.port)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/puppet/provider/aem_sling_resource/ruby.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method check_aem has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def check_aem
    uri = URI("#{aem_root}/system/console/bundles.json")
    http = Net::HTTP.new(uri.host, uri.port)
    http.set_debug_output($stdout) if Puppet[:debug]
    req = Net::HTTP::Get.new(uri.request_uri)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/puppet/provider/aem_sling_resource/ruby.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_delete has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def build_delete(is_val, should)
    to_delete = {}
    is_val.each do |key, value|
      next if ignored?(key, is_val)

Severity: Minor
Found in lib/puppet/provider/aem_sling_resource/ruby.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method aem_root has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def aem_root
    return @aem_root if @aem_root

    port = nil
    context_root = nil
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/puppet/provider/aem_sling_resource/ruby.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method get_depth has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def get_depth(data)
    max_depth = 1
    return max_depth unless data

    depth_func = lambda do |hsh, cur_depth|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/puppet/provider/aem_sling_resource/ruby.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method deep_merge_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def deep_merge_hash(to, from)
    # Pulled straight from Stack Overflow; don't ask me to to explain it.
    # http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9381553/ruby-merge-nested-hash
    merger = lambda do |_key, v1, v2|
      if v1.is_a?(Hash) && v2.is_a?(Hash)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/puppet/provider/aem_sling_resource/ruby.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_parameters has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def build_parameters
    params = {}
    if @property_flush[:ensure] == :absent
      params = params.merge(':operation' => 'delete')
    else
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/puppet/provider/aem_sling_resource/ruby.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Use each_value instead of each.
Open

      hsh.each do |_k, v|

This cop checks for uses of each_key and each_value Hash methods.

Note: If you have an array of two-element arrays, you can put parentheses around the block arguments to indicate that you're not working with a hash, and suppress RuboCop offenses.

Example:

# bad
hash.keys.each { |k| p k }
hash.values.each { |v| p v }
hash.each { |k, _v| p k }
hash.each { |_k, v| p v }

# good
hash.each_key { |k| p k }
hash.each_value { |v| p v }

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def check_aem
    uri = URI("#{aem_root}/system/console/bundles.json")
    http = Net::HTTP.new(uri.host, uri.port)
    http.set_debug_output($stdout) if Puppet[:debug]
    req = Net::HTTP::Get.new(uri.request_uri)
Severity: Major
Found in lib/puppet/provider/aem_sling_resource/ruby.rb and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
lib/puppet/provider/aem_crx_package/ruby.rb on lines 130..151
lib/puppet/provider/aem_osgi_config/ruby.rb on lines 60..81

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 99.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def aem_root
    return @aem_root if @aem_root

    port = nil
    context_root = nil
Severity: Major
Found in lib/puppet/provider/aem_sling_resource/ruby.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/puppet/provider/aem_crx_package/ruby.rb on lines 77..94
lib/puppet/provider/aem_osgi_config/ruby.rb on lines 40..57

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 65.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status