bugsnag/bugsnag-js

View on GitHub
packages/plugin-inline-script-content/inline-script-content.js

Summary

Maintainability
C
7 hrs
Test Coverage

Function load has 116 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  load: (client) => {
    if (!client._config.trackInlineScripts) return

    const originalLocation = win.location.href
    let html = ''
Severity: Major
Found in packages/plugin-inline-script-content/inline-script-content.js - About 4 hrs to fix

    Function exports has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    module.exports = (doc = document, win = window) => ({
      load: (client) => {
        if (!client._config.trackInlineScripts) return
    
        const originalLocation = win.location.href
    Severity: Minor
    Found in packages/plugin-inline-script-content/inline-script-content.js - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function __traceOriginalScript has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Wontfix

        function __traceOriginalScript (fn, callbackAccessor, alsoCallOriginal = false) {
          return function () {
            // this is required for removeEventListener to remove anything added with
            // addEventListener before the functions started being wrapped by Bugsnag
            const args = [].slice.call(arguments)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in packages/plugin-inline-script-content/inline-script-content.js - About 1 hr to fix

      Function eventTargetCallbackAccessor has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Wontfix

      function eventTargetCallbackAccessor (args) {
        const isEventHandlerObj = !!args[1] && typeof args[1].handleEvent === 'function'
        return {
          get: function () {
            return isEventHandlerObj ? args[1].handleEvent : args[1]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in packages/plugin-inline-script-content/inline-script-content.js - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

        configSchema: {
          trackInlineScripts: {
            validate: value => value === true || value === false,
            defaultValue: () => true,
            message: 'should be true|false'
      Severity: Minor
      Found in packages/plugin-inline-script-content/inline-script-content.js and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
      packages/plugin-browser-device/device.js on lines 66..72

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 46.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status