Sign upLogin

bundler/bundler

View on GitHub
Star
lib/bundler/version_ranges.rb

Summary

Maintainability
B
5 hrs
Test Coverage

Method empty? has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.empty?(ranges, neqs)
      !ranges.reduce(ReqR::UNIVERSAL) do |last_range, curr_range|
        next false unless last_range
        next false if curr_range.single? && neqs.include?(curr_range.left.version)
        next curr_range if last_range.right.version == ReqR::INFINITY
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/bundler/version_ranges.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method <=> has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def <=>(other)
          if version.equal?(INFINITY)
            return 0 if other.version.equal?(INFINITY)
            return 1
          elsif other.version.equal?(INFINITY)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/bundler/version_ranges.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method cover? has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def cover?(v)
        return false if left.inclusive && left.version > v
        return false if !left.inclusive && left.version >= v

        if right.version != INFINITY
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/bundler/version_ranges.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status