Showing 1,380 of 1,380 total issues
Function renderBody
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private renderBody({ projectPublishByStepsVM, userInfoEditVM, showPopError } : ProjectsPublishByStepsState) {
if (projectPublishByStepsVM.isLoadingProject || userInfoEditVM.isLoading) {
return h.loader()
} else {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validateCnpj
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
validateCnpj = cnpjStr => {
let tamanho, numeros, digitos, soma, pos, resultado;
const cnpj = cnpjStr.replace(/[^\d]+/g, '');
if (cnpj == '') {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function oninit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
oninit({attrs, state} : m.Vnode<UserInfoEditSettingsAttrs, UserInfoEditSettingsState>) {
const hasErrorOn = attrs.hasErrorOn
const getErrorsOn = attrs.getErrorsOn
const user = attrs.user
user.address = user.address || {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function AjaxParamParser
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getJasmineRequireObj().AjaxParamParser = function() {
function ParamParser() {
var defaults = [
{
test: function(xhr) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function oninit
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
oninit: function(vnode) {
const vm = rewardVM,
selectedReward = vm.selectedReward,
selectReward = vm.selectReward,
rewards = vm.rewards(),
Function oninit
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
oninit: function(vnode) {
let l = prop(false);
const project = vnode.attrs.project,
filterVM = catarse.filtersVM({
project_id: 'eq'
Function oninit
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
oninit: function(vnode) {
const translate = path => window.I18n.t(path, I18nScope());
vnode.state = {
stages: {
Function homeVM
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const homeVM = () => {
const _isUpdating = h.RedrawStream(false);
const _banners = h.RedrawStream([]);
async function getBanners() {
Function toNumber
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
I18n.toNumber = function(number, options) {
options = this.prepareOptions(
options
, this.lookup("number.format")
, NUMBER_FORMAT
Function view
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
view({ attrs } : m.Vnode<ShareReminderAttrs> ) {
const project = attrs.project
const projectUrl = `/projects/${project.id}/insights`
return (
Function AjaxRequestTracker
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getJasmineRequireObj().AjaxRequestTracker = function() {
function RequestTracker() {
var requests = [];
this.track = function(request) {
Function view
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
view({ attrs } : m.Vnode<DescriptionEditTipsAttrs>) {
const show = attrs.show
return (
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return preText + _.map(
post.rewards_that_can_access_post,
reward => `R$${h.formatNumber(reward.minimum_value)}${reward.title ? ` - ${reward.title}` : ''}`
).join(', ');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
state.showSubscriptionModal()
? m(subscriptionEditModal,
{
attrs,
vm: state.vm,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
postHeader = (post) => _.map(post.rewards_that_can_access_post, r => ` R$${h.formatNumber(r.minimum_value)}${r.title ? ` - ${r.title}` : ''}`),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
state.showSubscriptionModal()
? m(subscriptionEditModal,
{
attrs,
vm: state.vm,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function oninit
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
oninit: function(vnode) {
const filtersVM = catarse.filtersVM({
project_id: 'eq'
}),
projectAccount = prop([]),
Function showLastSubscriptionVersionRewardTitleIfHasOne
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const showLastSubscriptionVersionRewardTitleIfHasOne = () => {
const is_active = subscription.status === 'active';
const current_paid_subscription = subscription.current_paid_subscription;
const current_reward_data = subscription.current_reward_data;
const current_reward_id = subscription.current_reward_id;
Function oninit
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
oninit: function(vnode) {
const vm = projectDescriptionVideoVM,
mapErrors = [
['about_html', ['about_html']],
['video_url', ['video_url']]
Function select
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function select(matchesSelector) {
return function matches(node) {
if (!node) {
return []
}