File dse.py
has 526 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"""Dynamic symbolic execution module.
Offers a way to have a symbolic execution along a concrete one.
Basically, this is done through DSEEngine class, with scheme:
Function handle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle(self, cur_addr):
cur_addr = canonize_to_exprloc(self.lifter.loc_db, cur_addr)
symb_pc = self.eval_expr(self.lifter.IRDst)
possibilities = possible_values(symb_pc)
cur_path_constraint = set() # path_constraint for the concrete path
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _check_state
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _check_state(self):
"""Check the current state against the concrete one"""
errors = [] # List of DriftInfo
for symbol in self.symb.modified_expr:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function callback
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def callback(self, _):
"""Called before each instruction"""
# Assert synchronization with concrete execution
self._check_state()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function add_lib_handler
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_lib_handler(self, libimp, namespace):
"""Add search for handler based on a @libimp libimp instance
Known functions will be looked by {name}_symb or {name}_{ord}_symb in the @namespace
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if expr.is_mem():
addr_range = expr_range(expr.ptr)
# At upper bounds, add the size of the memory access
# if addr (- [a, b], then @size[addr] reachables
# values are in @8[a, b + size[
Function mem_read
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mem_read(self, expr_mem):
if not expr_mem.ptr.is_int():
return super(ESETrackModif, self).mem_read(expr_mem)
dst_addr = int(expr_mem.ptr)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if not value.is_int():
raise TypeError("Rely on a symbolic memory case, " \
"address 0x%x" % address)
path_constraint.add(ExprAssign(expr_mem, value))
Function __init__
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, machine, loc_db, produce_solution=PRODUCE_SOLUTION_CODE_COV,
Function _update_state_from_concrete_symb
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _update_state_from_concrete_symb(self, symbexec, cpu=True, mem=False):
if mem:
# Values will be retrieved from the concrete execution if they are
# not present
symbexec.symbols.symbols_mem.base_to_memarray.clear()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function restore_snapshot
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def restore_snapshot(self, snapshot, memory=True):
"""Restore a @snapshot taken with .take_snapshot
@snapshot: .take_snapshot output
@memory: (optional) if set, also restore the memory
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if isinstance(fname, tuple):
fname = b"%s_%d_symb" % (force_bytes(fname[0]), fname[1])
else:
fname = b"%s_symb" % force_bytes(fname)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if isinstance(fname, tuple):
fname = b"%s_%d_symb" % (force_bytes(fname[0]), fname[1])
else:
fname = b"%s_symb" % force_bytes(fname)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76