centralniak/py-raildriver

View on GitHub

Showing 7 of 7 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

class RailDriverGetMaxControllerValueTestCase(AbstractRaildriverDllTestCase):

    def test_get_by_index(self):
        with mock.patch.object(self.mock_dll, 'GetControllerValue', return_value=0.5) as mock_gcv:
            self.assertEqual(self.raildriver.get_max_controller_value(1), 0.5)
Severity: Major
Found in tests.py and 2 other locations - About 1 day to fix
tests.py on lines 155..167
tests.py on lines 248..260

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 139.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

class RailDriverGetMinControllerValueTestCase(AbstractRaildriverDllTestCase):

    def test_get_by_index(self):
        with mock.patch.object(self.mock_dll, 'GetControllerValue', return_value=0.5) as mock_gcv:
            self.assertEqual(self.raildriver.get_min_controller_value(1), 0.5)
Severity: Major
Found in tests.py and 2 other locations - About 1 day to fix
tests.py on lines 155..167
tests.py on lines 233..245

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 139.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

class RailDriverGetCurrentControllerValue(AbstractRaildriverDllTestCase):

    def test_get_by_index(self):
        with mock.patch.object(self.mock_dll, 'GetControllerValue', return_value=0.5) as mock_gcv:
            self.assertEqual(self.raildriver.get_current_controller_value(1), 0.5)
Severity: Major
Found in tests.py and 2 other locations - About 1 day to fix
tests.py on lines 233..245
tests.py on lines 248..260

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 139.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

class RailDriverGetCurrentGradientTestCase(AbstractRaildriverDllTestCase):

    def test_get(self):
        with mock.patch.object(self.mock_dll, 'GetControllerValue', return_value=0.1) as mock_gcv:
            self.assertEqual(self.raildriver.get_current_gradient(), 0.1)
Severity: Major
Found in tests.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
tests.py on lines 179..184
tests.py on lines 203..208

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 57.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

class RailDriverGetCurrentFuelLevelTestCase(AbstractRaildriverDllTestCase):

    def test_get(self):
        with mock.patch.object(self.mock_dll, 'GetControllerValue', return_value=100) as mock_gcv:
            self.assertEqual(self.raildriver.get_current_fuel_level(), 100)
Severity: Major
Found in tests.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
tests.py on lines 195..200
tests.py on lines 203..208

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 57.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

class RailDriverGetCurrentHeadingTestCase(AbstractRaildriverDllTestCase):

    def test_get(self):
        with mock.patch.object(self.mock_dll, 'GetControllerValue', return_value=0.1) as mock_gcv:
            self.assertEqual(self.raildriver.get_current_heading(), 0.1)
Severity: Major
Found in tests.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
tests.py on lines 179..184
tests.py on lines 195..200

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 57.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function _main_iteration has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def _main_iteration(self):
        self.iteration += 1
        self.previous_data = copy.copy(self.current_data)

        for field_name in self.subscribed_fields:
Severity: Minor
Found in raildriver/events.py - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language