Showing 156 of 156 total issues
Method parse_filters
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_filters(resource_klass, filters)
parsed_filters = {}
# apply default filters
resource_klass._allowed_filters.each do |filter, opts|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method jsonapi_resource
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def jsonapi_resource(*resources, &_block)
@resource_type = resources.first
res = JSONAPI::Resource.resource_klass_for(resource_type_with_module_prefix(@resource_type))
res._routed = true
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if linkage_relationship.polymorphic? && linkage_relationship.belongs_to?
linkage_relationship.resource_types.each do |resource_type|
klass = resource_klass_for(resource_type)
linkage_fields << {relationship: linkage_relationship, resource_klass: klass}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if linkage_relationship.polymorphic? && linkage_relationship.belongs_to?
linkage_relationship.resource_types.each do |resource_type|
klass = resource_klass_for(resource_type)
linkage_fields << {relationship_name: name, resource_klass: klass}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method initialize
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize
#:underscored_key, :camelized_key, :dasherized_key, or custom
self.json_key_format = :dasherized_key
#:underscored_route, :camelized_route, :dasherized_route, or custom
Method cached_relationships_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cached_relationships_hash(source, fetchable_fields, relationship_data)
relationships = {}
source.relationships.try(:each_pair) do |k,v|
if fetchable_fields.include?(unformat_key(k).to_sym)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_to_many_relationship
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_to_many_relationship(resource_klass, link_value, relationship, &add_result)
if (link_value.is_a?(Hash) || link_value.is_a?(ActionController::Parameters))
linkage = link_value[:data]
else
fail JSONAPI::Exceptions::InvalidLinksObject.new(error_object_overrides)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method change
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def change(callback)
completed = false
if @changing
run_callbacks callback do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _replace_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _replace_fields(field_data)
field_data[:attributes].each do |attribute, value|
begin
send "#{attribute}=", value
@save_needed = true
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method perform_joins
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform_joins(records, options)
join_array = flatten_join_tree_by_depth
join_array.each do |level_joins|
level_joins.each do |join_details|
Method parse_to_many_relationship
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_to_many_relationship(resource_klass, link_value, relationship, &add_result)
if (link_value.is_a?(Hash) || link_value.is_a?(ActionController::Parameters))
linkage = link_value[:data]
else
fail JSONAPI::Exceptions::InvalidLinksObject.new(error_object_overrides)
Method parse_params
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_params(resource_klass, params, allowed_fields)
verify_permitted_params(params, allowed_fields)
checked_attributes = {}
checked_to_one_relationships = {}
Method parse_sort_criteria
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_sort_criteria(resource_klass, sort_criteria)
return unless sort_criteria.present?
unless JSONAPI.configuration.allow_sort
fail JSONAPI::Exceptions::ParameterNotAllowed.new(:sort)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if res._immutable
options[:except] << :create unless options[:except].include?(:create) || options[:except].include?('create')
options[:except] << :update unless options[:except].include?(:update) || options[:except].include?('update')
options[:except] << :destroy unless options[:except].include?(:destroy) || options[:except].include?('destroy')
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method add_join
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_join(path, default_type = :inner, default_polymorphic_join_type = :left)
if source_relationship
if source_relationship.polymorphic?
# Polymorphic paths will come it with the resource_type as the first segment (for example `#documents.comments`)
# We just need to prepend the relationship portion the
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if res._immutable
options[:except] << :create unless options[:except].include?(:create) || options[:except].include?('create')
options[:except] << :update unless options[:except].include?(:update) || options[:except].include?('update')
options[:except] << :destroy unless options[:except].include?(:destroy) || options[:except].include?('destroy')
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method jsonapi_link
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def jsonapi_link(*links)
link_type = links.first
formatted_relationship_name = format_route(link_type)
options = links.extract_options!.dup
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _replace_to_many_links
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _replace_to_many_links(relationship_type, relationship_key_values, options)
relationship = self.class._relationship(relationship_type)
reflect = reflect_relationship?(relationship, options)
Method find
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find
filters = params[:filters]
include_directives = params[:include_directives]
sort_criteria = params[:sort_criteria]
paginator = params[:paginator]
Method links_page_params
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def links_page_params(options = {})
record_count = options[:record_count]
links_page_params = {}
links_page_params['first'] = {