Showing 167 of 167 total issues
Method discover
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def discover(type)
type = self.class.plural_types[type] || type
dir = File.dirname(@manifest_file)
Dir.glob("#{dir}/**/*").each do |file|
next if /manifest\.rb/ =~ file
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class << self
def option_parser(arguments)
parser = Compass::Exec::CommandOptionParser.new(arguments)
parser.extend(Compass::Exec::GlobalOptionsParser)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method perform
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform
super
require 'compass/stats'
compiler = new_compiler_instance
sass_files = sorted_sass_files(compiler)
Method installer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.installer(type, installer_opts = {}, &locator)
locator ||= lambda{|to| to}
loc_method = "install_location_for_#{type}".to_sym
define_method("simple_#{loc_method}", locator)
define_method(loc_method) do |to, options|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method perform!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform!
$command = args.shift
command_class = Compass::Commands[$command]
unless command_class
args.unshift($command)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method grad_point
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def grad_point(position)
original_value = position
position = unless position.is_a?(Sass::Script::Value::List)
opts(list([position], :space))
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compare_browser_versions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compare_browser_versions(browser, version1, version2)
assert_type browser, :String, :browser
assert_type version1, :String, :version1
assert_type version2, :String, :version2
index1 = index2 = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method opposite_position
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def opposite_position(position)
position = unless position.is_a?(Sass::Script::Value::List)
list(position, :space)
else
list(position.value.dup, position.separator)
Function cookie
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.cookie = function(name, value, options) {
if (typeof value != 'undefined') { // name and value given, set cookie
options = options || {};
if (value === null) {
value = '';
Method item_tree
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def item_tree(item, options = {})
crumb = item[:crumb] || item[:title]
options[:heading_level] ||= 1 if options.fetch(:headings, true)
child_html = ""
if options.fetch(:depth,1) > 0
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function setThemePreference(theme) {
$.cookie("compass-theme", null);
$.cookie("compass-theme", theme, {
expires: 60 * 60 * 24 * 365 * 10,
path: '/'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function setExampleMarkupSyntaxPreference (exampleMarkup) {
$.cookie("compass-example-markup", null);
$.cookie("compass-example-markup", exampleMarkup, { expires: 60 * 60 * 24 * 365 * 10, path: '/' });
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function setStyleSyntaxPreference (mainSyntax) {
$.cookie("compass-syntax", null);
$.cookie("compass-syntax", mainSyntax, { expires: 60 * 60 * 24 * 365 * 10, path: '/' });
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function setExampleStyleSyntaxPreference (exampleStyle) {
$.cookie("compass-example-style", null);
$.cookie("compass-example-style", exampleStyle, { expires: 60 * 60 * 24 * 365 * 10, path: '/' });
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method grad_point
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def grad_point(position)
original_value = position
position = unless position.is_a?(Sass::Script::Value::List)
opts(list([position], :space))
else
Method set_options
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_options(opts)
if $command == "create"
opts.banner = %Q{
Usage: compass create path/to/project [options]
Method serialize
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def serialize
contents = ""
(required_libraries || []).each do |lib|
contents << %Q{require '#{lib}'\n}
end
Method configuration_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configuration_for(config, filename = nil, defaults = nil)
if config.nil?
nil
elsif config.is_a?(Compass::Configuration::Data)
config
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Brush
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Brush()
{
function process(match, regexInfo)
{
var constructor = SyntaxHighlighter.Match,
Method perform
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform
if options[:display]
if Compass.configuration.respond_to?(options[:display])
puts Compass.configuration.send(options[:display])
else