chrislit/abydos

View on GitHub
abydos/stemmer/_clef_german_plus.py

Summary

Maintainability
A
1 hr
Test Coverage

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class CLEFGermanPlus. (16)
Open

class CLEFGermanPlus(_Stemmer):
    """CLEF German stemmer plus.

    The CLEF German stemmer plus is defined at :cite:`Savoy:2005`.

Severity: Minor
Found in abydos/stemmer/_clef_german_plus.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method stem. (15)
Open

    def stem(self, word: str) -> str:
        """Return 'CLEF German stemmer plus' stem.

        Parameters
        ----------
Severity: Minor
Found in abydos/stemmer/_clef_german_plus.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function stem has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def stem(self, word: str) -> str:
        """Return 'CLEF German stemmer plus' stem.

        Parameters
        ----------
Severity: Minor
Found in abydos/stemmer/_clef_german_plus.py - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
Open

        if wlen > 4 and word[-3:] == 'ern':
            word = word[:-3]
        elif wlen > 3 and word[-2:] in {'em', 'en', 'er', 'es'}:
            word = word[:-2]
        elif wlen > 2 and (
Severity: Major
Found in abydos/stemmer/_clef_german_plus.py - About 40 mins to fix

    Too few public methods (1/2)
    Open

    class CLEFGermanPlus(_Stemmer):

    Used when class has too few public methods, so be sure it's really worth it.

    Wrong hanging indentation before block (add 4 spaces).
    Open

                or (word[-1] == 's' and word[-2] in self._st_ending)

    TODO or (word[-1] == 's' and word[-2] in self.stending) ^ |

    Wrong hanging indentation before block (add 4 spaces).
    Open

                word[-1] == 'e'

    TODO word[-1] == 'e' ^ |

    Wrong hanging indentation before block (add 4 spaces).
    Open

                or (word[-2:] == 'st' and word[-3] in self._st_ending)

    TODO or (word[-2:] == 'st' and word[-3] in self.stending) ^ |

    Wrong hanging indentation before block (add 4 spaces).
    Open

                word[-2:] in {'er', 'en'}

    TODO word[-2:] in {'er', 'en'} ^ |

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status