Sign upLogin

christoph2/pydbc

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 197 of 197 total issues

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method exitAttributeValueType. (7)
Open

    def exitAttributeValueType(self, ctx):
        if ctx.i00:
            tp = "INT"
            value = (self.getValue(ctx.i00), self.getValue(ctx.i01), )
        elif ctx.i10:
Severity: Minor
Found in pydbc/dbcListener.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method exitGeneral_definition. (7)
Open

    def exitGeneral_definition(self, ctx):
        pv = ctx.pv.value
        sup = ctx.sup.value
        fun = ctx.fun.value
        var = ctx.var.value
Severity: Minor
Found in pydbc/ncfListener.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function exitCommand has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitCommand(self, ctx):
        if ctx.frameName:
            cmdName = "Frame"
        else:
            cmdName = ctx.c.text
Severity: Minor
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitDiag_frame_item(self, ctx):
        sname = self.getValue(ctx.sname)
        soffs = self.getValue(ctx.soffs)
        ctx.value = dict(signalName = sname, signalOffset = soffs)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py and 6 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 336..339
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 397..400
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 426..429
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 468..471
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 641..644
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 760..763

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitConfigurable_frame(self, ctx):
        fname = self.getValue(ctx.fname)
        mid = self.getValue(ctx.mid)
        ctx.value = dict(frameName = fname, messageID = mid)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py and 6 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 397..400
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 426..429
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 468..471
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 527..530
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 641..644
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 760..763

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitEncoding_definition_entry(self, ctx):
        name = ctx.name.value
        items = [x.value for x in ctx.items]
        ctx.value = dict(name = name, values = items)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ncfListener.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 490..493
pydbc/ncfListener.py on lines 59..62

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitSignal_definition_entry(self, ctx):
        n = ctx.n.value
        p = ctx.p.value if ctx.p else None
        ctx.value = dict(name = n, properties = p)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ncfListener.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ncfListener.py on lines 223..226

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitInit_value(self, ctx):
        scalar = self.getValue(ctx.s)
        array = self.getValue(ctx.a)
        ctx.value = dict(scalar = scalar, array = array)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py and 6 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 336..339
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 426..429
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 468..471
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 527..530
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 641..644
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 760..763

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitFrame_signal(self, ctx):
        sname = self.getValue(ctx.sname)
        soffs = self.getValue(ctx.soffs)
        ctx.value = dict(signalName = sname, signalOffset = soffs)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py and 6 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 336..339
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 397..400
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 426..429
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 527..530
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 641..644
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 760..763

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function exitNode_attributes_def has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitNode_attributes_def(self, ctx):
        self.log_insertion("NodeAttributes")
        items = [x.value for x in ctx.items]
        ctx.value = items
        attrs = ctx.value
Severity: Minor
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitSignal_group_item(self, ctx):
        sname = self.getValue(ctx.sname)
        goffs = self.getValue(ctx.goffs)
        ctx.value = dict(signalName = sname, groupOffset = goffs)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py and 6 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 336..339
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 397..400
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 468..471
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 527..530
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 641..644
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 760..763

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitSchedule_table_command(self, ctx):
        c = self.getValue(ctx.c)
        f = self.getValue(ctx.f)
        ctx.value = dict(command = c, frameTime = f)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py and 6 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 336..339
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 397..400
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 426..429
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 468..471
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 527..530
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 760..763

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitLogical_value(self, ctx):
        s = self.getValue(ctx.s)
        t = self.getValue(ctx.t)
        ctx.value = dict(signalValue = s, text = t)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py and 6 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 336..339
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 397..400
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 426..429
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 468..471
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 527..530
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 641..644

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitToplevel(self, ctx):
        v = ctx.v.value
        nodes = [x.value for x in ctx.nodes]
        self.value = dict(version = v, nodes = nodes)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ncfListener.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ldfListener.py on lines 490..493
pydbc/ncfListener.py on lines 197..200

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitSporadic_frame_item(self, ctx):
        name = ctx.sfn.value
        fnames = [x.value for x in ctx.names]
        ctx.value = dict(sporadicFrameName = name, frameNames = fnames)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ncfListener.py on lines 59..62
pydbc/ncfListener.py on lines 197..200

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def exitLogical_value(self, ctx):
        s = ctx.s.value
        t = ctx.t.value if ctx.t else None
        ctx.value = dict(signalValue = s, text = t)
Severity: Major
Found in pydbc/ncfListener.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
pydbc/ncfListener.py on lines 167..170

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 49.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method exitSignal_representation_def. (6)
Open

    def exitSignal_representation_def(self, ctx):
        self.log_insertion("SignalRepresentations")
        items = [x.value for x in ctx.items]
        ctx.value = items
        for sr in items:
Severity: Minor
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method exitSignal. (6)
Open

    def exitSignal(self, ctx):
        byteOrder = self.getValue(ctx.byteOrder)
        if not byteOrder in (0, 1):
            self.logger.error("While parsing signal: Error while parsing signal '{}': byteorder must be either 0 or 1 -- using 0".format(ctx.signalName.value))
            byteOrder = 0
Severity: Minor
Found in pydbc/dbcListener.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method exitFrame_def. (6)
Open

    def exitFrame_def(self, ctx):
        self.log_insertion("UnconditionalFrames")
        ctx.value = [x.value for x in ctx.items]
        for frame in ctx.value:
            frid = frame['frameID']
Severity: Minor
Found in pydbc/ldfListener.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method exitEnvironmentVariables. (6)
Open

    def exitEnvironmentVariables(self, ctx):
        self.log_insertion("EnvVars")
        # TODO: Process after EVDATA!!!
        ctx.value = [x.value for x in ctx.evs]
        for var in ctx.value:
Severity: Minor
Found in pydbc/dbcListener.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language