Showing 215 of 215 total issues
File jquery.js
has 6505 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery JavaScript Library v1.8.2
* http://jquery.com/
*
* Includes Sizzle.js
Function enableCssMediaQueries
has a Cognitive Complexity of 268 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
domReady(function enableCssMediaQueries(){
var _37;
var _38={LENGTH_UNIT:/[0-9]+(em|ex|px|in|cm|mm|pt|pc)$/,RESOLUTION_UNIT:/[0-9]+(dpi|dpcm)$/,ASPECT_RATIO:/^[0-9]+\/[0-9]+$/,ABSOLUTE_VALUE:/^[0-9]*(\.[0-9]+)*$/};
var _39=[];
var _3a=function(){
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function cssHelper
has a Cognitive Complexity of 185 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var cssHelper=function(){
var _3={BLOCKS:/[^\s{][^{]*\{(?:[^{}]*\{[^{}]*\}[^{}]*|[^{}]*)*\}/g,BLOCKS_INSIDE:/[^\s{][^{]*\{[^{}]*\}/g,DECLARATIONS:/[a-zA-Z\-]+[^;]*:[^;]+;/g,RELATIVE_URLS:/url\(['"]?([^\/\)'"][^:\)'"]+)['"]?\)/g,REDUNDANT_COMPONENTS:/(?:\/\*([^*\\\\]|\*(?!\/))+\*\/|@import[^;]+;)/g,REDUNDANT_WHITESPACE:/\s*(,|:|;|\{|\})\s*/g,MORE_WHITESPACE:/\s{2,}/g,FINAL_SEMICOLONS:/;\}/g,NOT_WHITESPACE:/\S+/g};
var _4,_5=false;
var _6=[];
var _7=function(fn){
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function cssHelper
has 412 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var cssHelper=function(){
var _3={BLOCKS:/[^\s{][^{]*\{(?:[^{}]*\{[^{}]*\}[^{}]*|[^{}]*)*\}/g,BLOCKS_INSIDE:/[^\s{][^{]*\{[^{}]*\}/g,DECLARATIONS:/[a-zA-Z\-]+[^;]*:[^;]+;/g,RELATIVE_URLS:/url\(['"]?([^\/\)'"][^:\)'"]+)['"]?\)/g,REDUNDANT_COMPONENTS:/(?:\/\*([^*\\\\]|\*(?!\/))+\*\/|@import[^;]+;)/g,REDUNDANT_WHITESPACE:/\s*(,|:|;|\{|\})\s*/g,MORE_WHITESPACE:/\s{2,}/g,FINAL_SEMICOLONS:/;\}/g,NOT_WHITESPACE:/\S+/g};
var _4,_5=false;
var _6=[];
var _7=function(fn){
File css3-mediaqueries.js
has 777 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
if(typeof Object.create!=="function"){
Object.create=function(o){
function F(){
};
F.prototype=o;
Function countdown
has 348 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fn.countdown = function( method /*,options*/ ) {
var defaults = {
date: (new Date()),
updateTime: 1000,
Function enableCssMediaQueries
has 287 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
domReady(function enableCssMediaQueries(){
var _37;
var _38={LENGTH_UNIT:/[0-9]+(em|ex|px|in|cm|mm|pt|pc)$/,RESOLUTION_UNIT:/[0-9]+(dpi|dpcm)$/,ASPECT_RATIO:/^[0-9]+\/[0-9]+$/,ABSOLUTE_VALUE:/^[0-9]*(\.[0-9]+)*$/};
var _39=[];
var _3a=function(){
Function ajax
has 237 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( url, options ) {
// If url is an object, simulate pre-1.5 signature
if ( typeof url === "object" ) {
options = url;
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( settings.direction === 'down' && ( todaysDate <= countdownDate || settings.minus ) ) {
time = template.replace( rDays, daysLeft ).replace( rHours, hrsLeft ).replace( rMins, minsLeft ).replace( rSecs, secLeft );
} else if ( settings.direction === 'up' && ( countdownDate <= todaysDate || settings.minus ) ) {
time = template.replace( rDays, daysLeft ).replace( rHours, hrsLeft ).replace( rMins, minsLeft ).replace( rSecs, secLeft );
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 180.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( settings.direction === 'down' && ( todaysDate <= countdownDate || settings.minus ) ) {
time = template.replace( rDays, daysLeft ).replace( rHours, hrsLeft ).replace( rMins, minsLeft ).replace( rSecs, secLeft );
} else if ( settings.direction === 'up' && ( countdownDate <= todaysDate || settings.minus ) ) {
time = template.replace( rDays, daysLeft ).replace( rHours, hrsLeft ).replace( rMins, minsLeft ).replace( rSecs, secLeft );
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 180.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( settings.direction === 'down' && ( todaysDate <= countdownDate || settings.minus ) ) {
time = template.replace( rDays, daysLeft ).replace( rHours, hrsLeft ).replace( rMins, minsLeft ).replace( rSecs, secLeft );
} else if ( settings.direction === 'up' && ( countdownDate <= todaysDate || settings.minus ) ) {
time = template.replace( rDays, daysLeft ).replace( rHours, hrsLeft ).replace( rMins, minsLeft ).replace( rSecs, secLeft );
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 180.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function support
has 143 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.support = (function() {
var support,
all,
a,
Function _40
has 131 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _40=function(_41,_42){
var l=_41.length;
var min=(_41.substring(0,4)==="min-");
var max=(!min&&_41.substring(0,4)==="max-");
if(_42!==null){
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( event.pageX == null && original.clientX != null ) {
eventDoc = event.target.ownerDocument || document;
doc = eventDoc.documentElement;
body = eventDoc.body;
Function Callbacks
has 125 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.Callbacks = function( options ) {
// Convert options from String-formatted to Object-formatted if needed
// (we check in cache first)
options = typeof options === "string" ?
Function app
has 121 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var app = (function($, window, document, undefined) {
var $window = $(window),
$document = $(document);
var _pageInit = function() {
File jquery.jcountdown1.3.js
has 351 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* jCountdown 1.3 jQuery Plugin
* Copyright 2011 Tom Ellis http://www.webmuse.co.uk
* Licensed under MIT License
* See http://www.webmuse.co.uk/license/
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if("height"===_41.substring(l-6,l)){
_47=document.documentElement.clientHeight||document.body.clientHeight;
if(_42!==null){
if(_43==="length"){
return ((min&&_47>=_44)||(max&&_47<_44)||(!min&&!max&&_47===_44));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 114.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if("width"===_41.substring(l-5,l)){
_46=document.documentElement.clientWidth||document.body.clientWidth;
if(_42!==null){
if(_43==="length"){
return ((min&&_46>=_44)||(max&&_46<_44)||(!min&&!max&&_46===_44));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 114.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function trigger
has 93 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
trigger: function( event, data, elem, onlyHandlers ) {
// Don't do events on text and comment nodes
if ( elem && (elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8) ) {
return;
}