Module has too many lines. [613/100] Open
module MU
# Subclass core thread so we can gracefully handle it when we hit system
# thread limits. Back off and wait makes sense for us, since most of our
# threads are terminal (in the dependency sense) and this is unlikely to get
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length a module exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for diff is too high. [94.92/75] Open
def diff(with, on = self, level: 0, parents: [], report: {}, habitat: nil)
return if with.nil? and on.nil?
if with.nil? or on.nil? or with.class != on.class
return # XXX ...however we're flagging differences
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Cyclomatic complexity for diff is too high. [31/30] Open
def diff(with, on = self, level: 0, parents: [], report: {}, habitat: nil)
return if with.nil? and on.nil?
if with.nil? or on.nil? or with.class != on.class
return # XXX ...however we're flagging differences
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if report_data and !report_data.empty?
report ||= {}
report[elt_namestr] = report_data
end
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
break if elt == other_elt # if they're identical, we're done
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return hash
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return struct.dup.to_s.force_encoding("ASCII-8BIT").encode('UTF-8', invalid: :replace, undef: :replace, replace: '?')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return struct
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false if !hash2[k].nil? and hash1[k] != hash2[k]
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false if !result
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return struct
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false if hash1[k] != hash2[k]
Avoid more than 4 levels of block nesting. Open
if ignoreme.include?(e.class)
return
else
raise e
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.
Avoid more than 4 levels of block nesting. Open
always.call if always and always.is_a?(Proc)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.
Avoid more than 4 levels of block nesting. Open
begin
@@mu_global_thread_semaphore.synchronize {
@@mu_global_threads.each { |t|
next if t == ::Thread.current
t.join(0.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.
Use each_key
instead of keys.each
. Open
hash2.keys.each { |k|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for uses of each_key
and each_value
Hash methods.
Note: If you have an array of two-element arrays, you can put parentheses around the block arguments to indicate that you're not working with a hash, and suppress RuboCop offenses.
Example:
# bad
hash.keys.each { |k| p k }
hash.values.each { |v| p v }
hash.each { |k, _v| p k }
hash.each { |_k, v| p v }
# good
hash.each_key { |k| p k }
hash.each_value { |v| p v }
Use each_key
instead of keys.each
. Open
hash1.keys.each { |k|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for uses of each_key
and each_value
Hash methods.
Note: If you have an array of two-element arrays, you can put parentheses around the block arguments to indicate that you're not working with a hash, and suppress RuboCop offenses.
Example:
# bad
hash.keys.each { |k| p k }
hash.values.each { |v| p v }
hash.each { |k, _v| p k }
hash.each { |_k, v| p v }
# good
hash.each_key { |k| p k }
hash.each_value { |v| p v }
Use delete
instead of gsub
. Open
chef_user = Etc.getpwuid(Process.uid).name.gsub(/\./, "")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop identifies places where gsub
can be replaced by
tr
or delete
.
Example:
# bad
'abc'.gsub('b', 'd')
'abc'.gsub('a', '')
'abc'.gsub(/a/, 'd')
'abc'.gsub!('a', 'd')
# good
'abc'.gsub(/.*/, 'a')
'abc'.gsub(/a+/, 'd')
'abc'.tr('b', 'd')
'a b c'.delete(' ')
Use caller(3..3).first
instead of caller[2]
. Open
details ||= caller[2]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop identifies places where caller[n]
can be replaced by caller(n..n).first
.
Example:
# bad
caller[1]
caller.first
caller_locations[1]
caller_locations.first
# good
caller(2..2).first
caller(1..1).first
caller_locations(2..2).first
caller_locations(1..1).first
Use =~
in places where the MatchData
returned by #match
will not be used. Open
if e.message.match(/Resource temporarily unavailable/)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop identifies the use of Regexp#match
or String#match
, which
returns #<MatchData>
/nil
. The return value of =~
is an integral
index/nil
and is more performant.
Example:
# bad
do_something if str.match(/regex/)
while regex.match('str')
do_something
end
# good
method(str =~ /regex/)
return value unless regex =~ 'str'
Use each_key
instead of keys.each
. Open
hash1.keys.each { |k|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for uses of each_key
and each_value
Hash methods.
Note: If you have an array of two-element arrays, you can put parentheses around the block arguments to indicate that you're not working with a hash, and suppress RuboCop offenses.
Example:
# bad
hash.keys.each { |k| p k }
hash.values.each { |v| p v }
hash.each { |k, _v| p k }
hash.each { |_k, v| p v }
# good
hash.each_key { |k| p k }
hash.each_value { |v| p v }
Use =~
in places where the MatchData
returned by #match
will not be used. Open
if File.dirname(__FILE__).match(/^#{Regexp.quote(p)}/)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop identifies the use of Regexp#match
or String#match
, which
returns #<MatchData>
/nil
. The return value of =~
is an integral
index/nil
and is more performant.
Example:
# bad
do_something if str.match(/regex/)
while regex.match('str')
do_something
end
# good
method(str =~ /regex/)
return value unless regex =~ 'str'
Use delete
instead of gsub
. Open
hostname = IO.readlines("/etc/hostname")[0].gsub(/\n/, '')
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop identifies places where gsub
can be replaced by
tr
or delete
.
Example:
# bad
'abc'.gsub('b', 'd')
'abc'.gsub('a', '')
'abc'.gsub(/a/, 'd')
'abc'.gsub!('a', 'd')
# good
'abc'.gsub(/.*/, 'a')
'abc'.gsub(/a+/, 'd')
'abc'.tr('b', 'd')
'a b c'.delete(' ')
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if Dir.exist?("#{MU.mainDataDir}/users/#{user}") and
File.readable?("#{MU.mainDataDir}/users/#{user}/realname") and
File.size?("#{MU.mainDataDir}/users/#{user}/realname")
return File.read("#{MU.mainDataDir}/users/#{user}/realname").chomp
elsif @userlist.has_key?(user)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 64.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if Dir.exist?("#{MU.mainDataDir}/users/#{user}") and
File.readable?("#{MU.mainDataDir}/users/#{user}/email") and
File.size?("#{MU.mainDataDir}/users/#{user}/email")
return File.read("#{MU.mainDataDir}/users/#{user}/email").chomp
elsif @userlist.has_key?(user)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 64.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
on_unique.each { |e|
namestr, loc = MU::MommaCat.getChunkName(e)
report ||= {}
report[namestr] = { :action => :removed, :parents => parents, :value => e.clone }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
with_unique.each { |e|
namestr, loc = MU::MommaCat.getChunkName(e)
report ||= {}
report[namestr] = { :action => :added, :parents => parents, :value => e.clone }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
with_unique.each { |k|
report[k] = { :action => :added, :parents => parents, :value => with[k].clone }
report[k][:habitat] = habitat if habitat
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
on_unique.each { |k|
report[k] = { :action => :removed, :parents => parents, :value => on[k].clone }
report[k][:habitat] = habitat if habitat
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
end
at 399, 6 is not aligned with if
at 390, 17. Open
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks whether the end keywords are aligned properly.
Three modes are supported through the EnforcedStyleAlignWith
configuration parameter:
If it's set to keyword
(which is the default), the end
shall be aligned with the start of the keyword (if, class, etc.).
If it's set to variable
the end
shall be aligned with the
left-hand-side of the variable assignment, if there is one.
If it's set to start_of_line
, the end
shall be aligned with the
start of the line where the matching keyword appears.
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: keyword (default)
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: variable
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: startofline
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
puts(if true
end)
Do not suppress exceptions. Open
rescue NameError
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for rescue blocks with no body.
Example:
# bad
def some_method
do_something
rescue
# do nothing
end
Example:
# bad
begin
do_something
rescue
# do nothing
end
Example:
# good
def some_method
do_something
rescue
handle_exception
end
Example:
# good
begin
do_something
rescue
handle_exception
end
File.exists?
is deprecated in favor of File.exist?
. Open
File.exists?("/etc/hostname") and File.exists?("/etc/hosts")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for uses of the deprecated class method usages.
Example:
# bad
File.exists?(some_path)
Example:
# good
File.exist?(some_path)
File.exists?
is deprecated in favor of File.exist?
. Open
File.exists?("/etc/hostname") and File.exists?("/etc/hosts")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for uses of the deprecated class method usages.
Example:
# bad
File.exists?(some_path)
Example:
# good
File.exist?(some_path)
Useless assignment to variable - changes
. Open
changes = []
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for every useless assignment to local variable in every
scope.
The basic idea for this cop was from the warning of ruby -cw
:
assigned but unused variable - foo
Currently this cop has advanced logic that detects unreferenced reassignments and properly handles varied cases such as branch, loop, rescue, ensure, etc.
Example:
# bad
def some_method
some_var = 1
do_something
end
Example:
# good
def some_method
some_var = 1
do_something(some_var)
end
Do not suppress exceptions. Open
rescue NameError
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for rescue blocks with no body.
Example:
# bad
def some_method
do_something
rescue
# do nothing
end
Example:
# bad
begin
do_something
rescue
# do nothing
end
Example:
# good
def some_method
do_something
rescue
handle_exception
end
Example:
# good
begin
do_something
rescue
handle_exception
end
Do not suppress exceptions. Open
rescue NameError
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for rescue blocks with no body.
Example:
# bad
def some_method
do_something
rescue
# do nothing
end
Example:
# bad
begin
do_something
rescue
# do nothing
end
Example:
# good
def some_method
do_something
rescue
handle_exception
end
Example:
# good
begin
do_something
rescue
handle_exception
end
Redundant use of Object#to_s
in interpolation. Open
MU.log "Hit the wall at #{toomany.to_s} threads, waiting until there are fewer", MU::WARN
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for string conversion in string interpolation, which is redundant.
Example:
# bad
"result is #{something.to_s}"
Example:
# good
"result is #{something}"
end
at 922, 6 is not aligned with if
at 918, 13. Open
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks whether the end keywords are aligned properly.
Three modes are supported through the EnforcedStyleAlignWith
configuration parameter:
If it's set to keyword
(which is the default), the end
shall be aligned with the start of the keyword (if, class, etc.).
If it's set to variable
the end
shall be aligned with the
left-hand-side of the variable assignment, if there is one.
If it's set to start_of_line
, the end
shall be aligned with the
start of the line where the matching keyword appears.
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: keyword (default)
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: variable
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
variable = if true
end
Example: EnforcedStyleAlignWith: startofline
# bad
variable = if true
end
# good
puts(if true
end)