Class Director
has 70 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Director
DIRECTOR_HTTP_ERROR_CODES = [400, 403, 404, 500]
API_TIMEOUT = 86400 * 3
File director.rb
has 561 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'cli/core_ext'
require 'cli/errors'
require 'json'
require 'httpclient'
Method request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def request(method, uri, content_type = nil, payload = nil, headers = {}, options = {})
headers = headers.dup
headers['Content-Type'] = content_type if content_type
tmp_file = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method request
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def request(method, uri, content_type = nil, payload = nil, headers = {}, options = {})
headers = headers.dup
headers['Content-Type'] = content_type if content_type
tmp_file = nil
Method request_and_track
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def request_and_track(method, uri, options = {})
options = options.dup
content_type = options.delete(:content_type)
payload = options.delete(:payload)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_task_output
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_task_output(task_id, offset, log_type = nil)
uri = "/tasks/#{task_id}/output"
uri += "?type=#{log_type}" if log_type
headers = { 'Range' => "bytes=#{offset}-" }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method setup_ssh
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def setup_ssh(deployment_name, job, index, user,
public_key, password, options = {})
Method try_to_perform_http_request
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def try_to_perform_http_request(method, uri, payload, headers, num_retries, retry_wait_interval, &response_reader)
Method fetch_logs
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fetch_logs(deployment_name, job_name, index, log_type,
filters = nil, options = {})
Method change_job_state
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def change_job_state(deployment_name, manifest_yaml,
job_name, index, new_state, options = {})
Method request
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def request(method, uri, content_type = nil, payload = nil, headers = {}, options = {})
Method try_to_perform_http_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def try_to_perform_http_request(method, uri, payload, headers, num_retries, retry_wait_interval, &response_reader)
num_retries.downto(1) do |n|
begin
return perform_http_request(method, uri, payload, headers, &response_reader)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rename_job
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rename_job(deployment_name, manifest_yaml, old_name, new_name,
force = false, options = {})
Method cleanup_ssh
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cleanup_ssh(deployment_name, job, user_regex, indexes, options = {})
Method perform_http_request
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform_http_request(method, uri, payload = nil, headers = {}, &block)
Method get_task
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_task(task_id)
response_code, body = get("/tasks/#{task_id}")
raise AuthError if response_code == 401
raise MissingTask, "Task #{task_id} not found" if response_code == 404
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def rebase_remote_release(release_location, options = {})
options = options.dup
payload = { 'location' => release_location }
options[:payload] = JSON.generate(payload)
options[:content_type] = 'application/json'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_remote_release(release_location, options = {})
options = options.dup
payload = { 'location' => release_location }
options[:payload] = JSON.generate(payload)
options[:content_type] = 'application/json'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_remote_stemcell(stemcell_location, options = {})
options = options.dup
payload = { 'location' => stemcell_location }
options[:payload] = JSON.generate(payload)
options[:content_type] = 'application/json'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76