Showing 147 of 151 total issues
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return value.join(", ") if value.is_a? Array
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return display_datetime(value, relative: false) if value.is_a? Time
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def data
records.map do |record|
{
id: record.id,
first_name: record.user.first_name,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def data
records.map do |record|
{
id: record.id,
first_name: record.user.first_name,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def data
records.map do |record|
{
id: record.id,
first_name: record.user.first_name,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method display_audit_value
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def display_audit_value(value, field)
return "(none)" if value.blank?
return Questionnaire::POSSIBLE_ACC_STATUS[value] if field == "acc_status"
return BusList.find(value)&.name || value if field == "bus_list_id"
return User.find_by_id(value)&.full_name || "(deleted user)" if field == "checked_in_by_id"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Block has too many lines. [26/25] Open
format.html do
redirect_to_checkins = params[:redirect_to_checkins] || false
show_redirect_path = redirect_to_checkins ? manage_checkin_path(@questionnaire) : manage_questionnaire_path(@questionnaire)
index_redirect_path = redirect_to_checkins ? manage_checkins_path : manage_questionnaires_path
if params[:check_in] == "true"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.
Method active_link_to
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def active_link_to(name = nil, options = nil, html_options = nil, &block)
# this is from Rails source - ignore rubocop
# rubocop:disable Style/ParallelAssignment
html_options, options, name = options, name, block if block_given?
options ||= {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def vcs_url=(value)
value = value.downcase unless value.blank?
value = "https://" + value if !value.blank? && !value.include?("http://") && !value.include?("https://")
super value
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def portfolio_url=(value)
value = value.downcase unless value.blank?
value = "http://" + value if !value.blank? && !value.include?("http://") && !value.include?("https://")
super value
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
POSSIBLE_SIMPLE_RECIPIENTS = {
"all" => "Everyone",
"incomplete" => "Incomplete Applications",
"complete" => "Complete Applications",
"accepted" => "Accepted Applications",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
POSSIBLE_TRIGGERS = {
"questionnaire.pending" => "Questionnaire Status: Pending Review (new application)",
"questionnaire.accepted" => "Questionnaire Status: Accepted",
"questionnaire.waitlist" => "Questionnaire Status: Waitlisted",
"questionnaire.denied" => "Questionnaire Status: Denied",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Useless assignment to variable - ex
. Open
rescue => ex
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for every useless assignment to local variable in every
scope.
The basic idea for this cop was from the warning of ruby -cw
:
assigned but unused variable - foo
Currently this cop has advanced logic that detects unreferenced reassignments and properly handles varied cases such as branch, loop, rescue, ensure, etc.
Example:
# bad
def some_method
some_var = 1
do_something
end
Example:
# good
def some_method
some_var = 1
do_something(some_var)
end
Align the elements of a hash literal if they span more than one line. Open
"denied" => "Denied",
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Check that the keys, separators, and values of a multi-line hash literal are aligned according to configuration. The configuration options are:
- key (left align keys, one space before hash rockets and values)
- separator (align hash rockets and colons, right align keys)
- table (left align keys, hash rockets, and values)
The treatment of hashes passed as the last argument to a method call can also be configured. The options are:
- always_inspect
- always_ignore
- ignore_implicit (without curly braces)
- ignore_explicit (with curly braces)
Example: EnforcedHashRocketStyle: key (default)
# bad
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
# good
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
Example: EnforcedHashRocketStyle: separator
# bad
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
# good
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
Example: EnforcedHashRocketStyle: table
# bad
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
# good
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
Example: EnforcedColonStyle: key (default)
# bad
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
# good
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
Example: EnforcedColonStyle: separator
# bad
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
# good
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
Example: EnforcedColonStyle: table
# bad
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
# good
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: always_inspect (default)
# Inspect both implicit and explicit hashes.
# bad
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# bad
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
# good
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# good
do_something(
foo: 1,
bar: 2
)
# good
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
# good
do_something({
foo: 1,
bar: 2
})
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: always_ignore
# Ignore both implicit and explicit hashes.
# good
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# good
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: ignore_implicit
# Ignore only implicit hashes.
# bad
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
# good
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: ignore_explicit
# Ignore only explicit hashes.
# bad
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# good
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
Add empty line after guard clause. Open
return if school.blank?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop enforces empty line after guard clause
Example:
# bad
def foo
return if need_return?
bar
end
# good
def foo
return if need_return?
bar
end
# good
def foo
return if something?
return if something_different?
bar
end
# also good
def foo
if something?
do_something
return if need_return?
end
end
Align the elements of a hash literal if they span more than one line. Open
range: :bootstrap_vertical_range,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Check that the keys, separators, and values of a multi-line hash literal are aligned according to configuration. The configuration options are:
- key (left align keys, one space before hash rockets and values)
- separator (align hash rockets and colons, right align keys)
- table (left align keys, hash rockets, and values)
The treatment of hashes passed as the last argument to a method call can also be configured. The options are:
- always_inspect
- always_ignore
- ignore_implicit (without curly braces)
- ignore_explicit (with curly braces)
Example: EnforcedHashRocketStyle: key (default)
# bad
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
# good
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
Example: EnforcedHashRocketStyle: separator
# bad
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
# good
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
Example: EnforcedHashRocketStyle: table
# bad
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
# good
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
Example: EnforcedColonStyle: key (default)
# bad
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
# good
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
Example: EnforcedColonStyle: separator
# bad
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
# good
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
Example: EnforcedColonStyle: table
# bad
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
# good
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: always_inspect (default)
# Inspect both implicit and explicit hashes.
# bad
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# bad
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
# good
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# good
do_something(
foo: 1,
bar: 2
)
# good
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
# good
do_something({
foo: 1,
bar: 2
})
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: always_ignore
# Ignore both implicit and explicit hashes.
# good
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# good
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: ignore_implicit
# Ignore only implicit hashes.
# bad
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
# good
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: ignore_explicit
# Ignore only explicit hashes.
# bad
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# good
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
Align the elements of a hash literal if they span more than one line. Open
file: :bootstrap_vertical_file,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Check that the keys, separators, and values of a multi-line hash literal are aligned according to configuration. The configuration options are:
- key (left align keys, one space before hash rockets and values)
- separator (align hash rockets and colons, right align keys)
- table (left align keys, hash rockets, and values)
The treatment of hashes passed as the last argument to a method call can also be configured. The options are:
- always_inspect
- always_ignore
- ignore_implicit (without curly braces)
- ignore_explicit (with curly braces)
Example: EnforcedHashRocketStyle: key (default)
# bad
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
# good
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
Example: EnforcedHashRocketStyle: separator
# bad
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
# good
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
Example: EnforcedHashRocketStyle: table
# bad
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
# good
{
:foo => bar,
:ba => baz
}
Example: EnforcedColonStyle: key (default)
# bad
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
# good
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
Example: EnforcedColonStyle: separator
# bad
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
# good
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
Example: EnforcedColonStyle: table
# bad
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
# good
{
foo: bar,
ba: baz
}
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: always_inspect (default)
# Inspect both implicit and explicit hashes.
# bad
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# bad
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
# good
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# good
do_something(
foo: 1,
bar: 2
)
# good
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
# good
do_something({
foo: 1,
bar: 2
})
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: always_ignore
# Ignore both implicit and explicit hashes.
# good
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# good
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: ignore_implicit
# Ignore only implicit hashes.
# bad
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
# good
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
Example: EnforcedLastArgumentHashStyle: ignore_explicit
# Ignore only explicit hashes.
# bad
do_something(foo: 1,
bar: 2)
# good
do_something({foo: 1,
bar: 2})
Use School.where("questionnaire_count >= 5").count.positive?
instead of School.where("questionnaire_count >= 5").count > 0
. Open
if School.where("questionnaire_count >= 5").count > 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for usage of comparison operators (==
,
>
, <
) to test numbers as zero, positive, or negative.
These can be replaced by their respective predicate methods.
The cop can also be configured to do the reverse.
The cop disregards #nonzero?
as it its value is truthy or falsey,
but not true
and false
, and thus not always interchangeable with
!= 0
.
The cop ignores comparisons to global variables, since they are often
populated with objects which can be compared with integers, but are
not themselves Integer
polymorphic.
Example: EnforcedStyle: predicate (default)
# bad
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
# good
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
Example: EnforcedStyle: comparison
# bad
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
# good
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
Rule doesn't have all its properties in alphabetical order. Open
.gridBlock .twoByGridBlock {
- Exclude checks
Use of !important Open
display: block !important;
- Exclude checks