Sign upLogin

codebar/planner

View on GitHub
Star
app/models/invitation_manager.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
1 hr
Test Coverage

Method send_event_emails has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def send_event_emails(event, chapter)
    return 'The event is not invitable' unless event.invitable?

    invite_coaches_to_event(event, chapter) unless event.audience.eql?('Students')
    invite_students_to_event(event, chapter) unless event.audience.eql?('Coaches')
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/invitation_manager.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def invite_coaches_to_event(event, chapter)
    chapter_coaches(chapter).each do |coach|
      invitation = Invitation.new(event: event, member: coach, role: 'Coach')
      EventInvitationMailer.invite_coach(event, coach, invitation).deliver_now if invitation.save
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/invitation_manager.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
app/models/invitation_manager.rb on lines 30..33

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def invite_students_to_event(event, chapter)
    chapter_students(chapter).each do |student|
      invitation = Invitation.new(event: event, member: student, role: 'Student')
      EventInvitationMailer.invite_student(event, student, invitation).deliver_now if invitation.save
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/invitation_manager.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
app/models/invitation_manager.rb on lines 37..40

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 27.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Omit the hash value.
Open

      invitation = Invitation.new(event: event, member: student, role: 'Student')
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/invitation_manager.rb by rubocop

Checks hash literal syntax.

It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).

A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.

The supported styles are:

  • ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g. {a: 1}) when hashes have all symbols for keys
  • hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
  • nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
  • ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes

This cop has EnforcedShorthandSyntax option. It can enforce either the use of the explicit hash value syntax or the use of Ruby 3.1's hash value shorthand syntax.

The supported styles are:

  • always - forces use of the 3.1 syntax (e.g. {foo:})
  • never - forces use of explicit hash literal value
  • either - accepts both shorthand and explicit use of hash literal value
  • consistent - forces use of the 3.1 syntax only if all values can be omitted in the hash

Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)

# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}

# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden

Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets

# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}

# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}

Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys

# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}

# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}

Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys

# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets

# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: always (default)

# bad
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

# good
{foo:, bar:}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: never

# bad
{foo:, bar:}

# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: either

# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

# good
{foo: foo, bar:}

# good
{foo:, bar:}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: consistent

# bad - `foo` and `bar` values can be omitted
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

# bad - `bar` value can be omitted
{foo:, bar: bar}

# bad - mixed syntaxes
{foo:, bar: baz}

# good
{foo:, bar:}

# good - can't omit `baz`
{foo: foo, bar: baz}

Omit the hash value.
Open

      invitation = Invitation.new(event: event, member: coach, role: 'Coach')
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/invitation_manager.rb by rubocop

Checks hash literal syntax.

It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).

A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.

The supported styles are:

  • ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g. {a: 1}) when hashes have all symbols for keys
  • hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
  • nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
  • ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes

This cop has EnforcedShorthandSyntax option. It can enforce either the use of the explicit hash value syntax or the use of Ruby 3.1's hash value shorthand syntax.

The supported styles are:

  • always - forces use of the 3.1 syntax (e.g. {foo:})
  • never - forces use of explicit hash literal value
  • either - accepts both shorthand and explicit use of hash literal value
  • consistent - forces use of the 3.1 syntax only if all values can be omitted in the hash

Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)

# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}

# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden

Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets

# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}

# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}

Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys

# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}

# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}

Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys

# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets

# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: always (default)

# bad
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

# good
{foo:, bar:}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: never

# bad
{foo:, bar:}

# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: either

# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

# good
{foo: foo, bar:}

# good
{foo:, bar:}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: consistent

# bad - `foo` and `bar` values can be omitted
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

# bad - `bar` value can be omitted
{foo:, bar: bar}

# bad - mixed syntaxes
{foo:, bar: baz}

# good
{foo:, bar:}

# good - can't omit `baz`
{foo: foo, bar: baz}

Omit the hash value.
Open

      invitation = MeetingInvitation.new(meeting: meeting, member: invitee, role: 'Participant')
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/invitation_manager.rb by rubocop

Checks hash literal syntax.

It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).

A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.

The supported styles are:

  • ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g. {a: 1}) when hashes have all symbols for keys
  • hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
  • nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
  • ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes

This cop has EnforcedShorthandSyntax option. It can enforce either the use of the explicit hash value syntax or the use of Ruby 3.1's hash value shorthand syntax.

The supported styles are:

  • always - forces use of the 3.1 syntax (e.g. {foo:})
  • never - forces use of explicit hash literal value
  • either - accepts both shorthand and explicit use of hash literal value
  • consistent - forces use of the 3.1 syntax only if all values can be omitted in the hash

Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)

# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}

# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden

Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets

# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}

# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}

Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys

# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}

# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}

Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys

# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets

# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: always (default)

# bad
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

# good
{foo:, bar:}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: never

# bad
{foo:, bar:}

# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: either

# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

# good
{foo: foo, bar:}

# good
{foo:, bar:}

Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: consistent

# bad - `foo` and `bar` values can be omitted
{foo: foo, bar: bar}

# bad - `bar` value can be omitted
{foo:, bar: bar}

# bad - mixed syntaxes
{foo:, bar: baz}

# good
{foo:, bar:}

# good - can't omit `baz`
{foo: foo, bar: baz}

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status