Sign upLogin

coding-chimp/onesignal

View on GitHub
Star
lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def initialize(attributes = {})
      if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
        fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `OneSignal::StringMap` initialize method"
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File string_map.rb has 436 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require 'date'
require 'time'

module OneSignal
  class StringMap
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb - About 6 hrs to fix

    Method initialize has 138 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def initialize(attributes = {})
      if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
        fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `OneSignal::StringMap` initialize method"
      end
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb - About 5 hrs to fix

      Method attribute_map has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def self.attribute_map
      {
        :'en' => :'en',
        :'ar' => :'ar',
        :'bs' => :'bs',
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method openapi_types has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def self.openapi_types
      {
        :'en' => :'String',
        :'ar' => :'String',
        :'bs' => :'String',
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method == has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def ==(o)
      return true if self.equal?(o)
      self.class == o.class &&
          en == o.en &&
          ar == o.ar &&
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb - About 1 hr to fix

            Method _deserialize has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                def _deserialize(type, value)
      case type.to_sym
      when :Time
        Time.parse(value)
      when :Date
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb - About 1 hr to fix

              Method build_from_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def build_from_hash(attributes)
      return nil unless attributes.is_a?(Hash)
      attributes = attributes.transform_keys(&:to_sym)
      self.class.openapi_types.each_pair do |key, type|
        if attributes[self.class.attribute_map[key]].nil? && self.class.openapi_nullable.include?(key)
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb - About 1 hr to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method _deserialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def _deserialize(type, value)
      case type.to_sym
      when :Time
        Time.parse(value)
      when :Date
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb - About 1 hr to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method to_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def to_hash
      hash = {}
      self.class.attribute_map.each_pair do |attr, param|
        value = self.send(attr)
        if value.nil?
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb - About 45 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method _to_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def _to_hash(value)
      if value.is_a?(Array)
        value.compact.map { |v| _to_hash(v) }
      elsif value.is_a?(Hash)
        {}.tap do |hash|
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def self.attribute_map
      {
        :'en' => :'en',
        :'ar' => :'ar',
        :'bs' => :'bs',
              Severity: Major
              Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
              lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb on lines 202..246

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 90.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def self.openapi_types
      {
        :'en' => :'String',
        :'ar' => :'String',
        :'bs' => :'String',
              Severity: Major
              Found in lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
              lib/onesignal/models/string_map.rb on lines 148..192

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 90.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              There are no issues that match your filters.

              Category
              Status