concord-consortium/lara

View on GitHub
lara-typescript/src/section-authoring/components/section-item-picker.tsx

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Function SectionItemPicker has 189 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

export const SectionItemPicker: React.FC<IProps> = (props) => {
  const api = usePageAPI();
  const allItems = useMemo(() => {
    if (!api.getAllEmbeddables.data) {
      return undefined;

    Function SectionItemPicker has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    export const SectionItemPicker: React.FC<IProps> = (props) => {
      const api = usePageAPI();
      const allItems = useMemo(() => {
        if (!api.getAllEmbeddables.data) {
          return undefined;

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function renderAllItemsList has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      const renderAllItemsList = () => {
        if (isSearching) {
          return (
            <div id="searchPlaceholder" className="loading">
              <em>Searching...</em>

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status